Verdictly
Settlement
Effingham County • 2008

Effingham County FTCA Negligence Claim Settles for $15,000

One driver was traveling on Interstate 95 when he collided with an Army vehicle. The driver alleged the collision was caused by the other driver's negligence. The case was settled for $15,000.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Multi-vehicle
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$15,000
County
Effingham County, GA
Resolved
2008

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Multi-vehicle
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Physical Injury

Settlement Context

This settlement of $15,000 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On April 26, 2003, a civilian driver was involved in a collision with an Army vehicle on Interstate 95 in Effingham County, Georgia. The civilian driver, who became the plaintiff, alleged that the accident was caused by the negligence of the Army vehicle driver, an employee of the United States acting within the scope of employment. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the United States in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, seeking damages for personal injuries under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).

The case was one of three consolidated negligence-based FTCA claims against the United States. The parties ultimately reached a compromise settlement. The defendant, the United States, agreed to pay the plaintiff $15,000 to resolve the FTCA claims. On October 27, 2008, the court dismissed the case with prejudice, while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Effingham County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2008, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

57
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Effingham County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case