Cherokee County Court Issues Defense Verdict in Rental Car Negligence
One driver rented a car and lost control on a rural road, causing a collision. The driver's seatbelt broke, and they were thrown into the back seat, sustaining injuries. The rental car was totaled.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $10,000
- County
- DeKalb County, GA
- Resolved
- 1995
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Facial Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-defense of $10,000 is above the median of Undisclosed for facial injury cases resolved by verdict-defense. The typical range is Undisclosed to $10,000, based on 3 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In Cherokee County, a plaintiff driving a rented automobile lost control on a rural road, resulting in a collision. The plaintiff alleged the vehicle had bald tires and a defective seatbelt, which reportedly broke during the crash. The plaintiff was thrown into the backseat, sustaining a fractured collarbone and facial lacerations. The vehicle was totaled.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant rental company was negligent in leasing a defective automobile, which was the proximate cause of the accident. The defendant countered that the vehicle was in good condition, the plaintiff had assumed the risk, and lost control due to excessive speed. The defendant also filed a counterclaim for the loss of the rental vehicle, valued at $10,000. The plaintiff sought $16,000 in medical expenses and $12,000 for lost income.
The court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant on the issue of liability regarding the plaintiff's claims. Following this ruling, the case proceeded on the defendant's counterclaim. The record indicates the case concluded after this verdict. Separately, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the automobile manufacturer concerning the seatbelt, which was later settled.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in DeKalb County, Georgia. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 1995, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in DeKalb County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A plaintiff alleged bilateral rotator cuff injuries resulted from paramedics' forceful removal of the plaintiff from a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants, presumably alleging negligence in the plaintiff's care. The court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment in September 2006, concluding the case in favor of the defense.
The employer, Star*Tel Systems, appealed a decision by an administrative law judge in Kentucky. The judge had previously determined that an employee sustained a permanent and total disability following a work-related motor vehicle accident. The appeal challenged the judge's opinion, order, and award.
A collision occurred on September 20, 2012, on Kentucky Avenue near Floyd Street in Louisville. The plaintiff, then age 41, was making a right turn when the defendant pulled from a space to the plaintiff's right, resulting in the crash. The plaintiff sustained a rotator cuff injury that required surgical repair. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently pulled from a parking lane into the plaintiff's path. The plaintiff sought $3,917 for past medical expenses, up to $15,000 for future medicals, and $120,000 for pain and suffering. The defendant denied liability, arguing she was in a turn lane, not a parking lane. An independent medical examiner for the defense also linked the plaintiff's shoulder issues to pre-existing degenerative conditions. Following a trial, a jury found in favor of the defendant on the issue of liability. A defense judgment was subsequently entered, and the plaintiff received no damages.
A personal injury case arose from an auto accident. The plaintiff retained an expert in economics to assess damages. The defendant presented experts in emergency medicine, biomechanics, and accident reconstruction, suggesting disputes over the nature or cause of injuries. An occupational therapy expert also participated in the case. The matter proceeded to a trial, which concluded on December 9, 2016. Details regarding the verdict or any award were not specified in the record.
A vehicle collision occurred in May 2008 on Stony Brook when a teenager, pulling from a private drive, struck a childcare worker's vehicle. The childcare worker sustained soft-tissue neck pain and was transported to the emergency room. Liability for the collision was later established by summary judgment. The injured worker subsequently filed a lawsuit in Louisville, seeking damages for medical bills, lost wages, impairment, and pain and suffering. The plaintiff's case was complicated by involvement in a second crash a month later, though injuries were distinguished. The defendant disputed the claimed injuries, citing credibility, lack of objective proof, and a "threshold" defense. The jury found the plaintiff met the medical expense threshold but did not sustain a permanent injury. Ultimately, the jury awarded the plaintiff $8,184 for medical expenses but $0 for lost wages, impairment, and pain and suffering, resulting in a total verdict of $8,184. A judgment consistent with this verdict was entered. The plaintiff later moved for a new trial, arguing the verdict was inadequate. The defendant countered, citing credibility issues. The motion was pending as of June 2016.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.