Verdictly
Settlement
Fulton County • 2016

Atlanta Big-Rig Rear-End Collision Settles for $250,000

A man was injured when his car was hit from behind by a freight truck. His vehicle was pushed into the car in front of him. The truck driver was cited for following too closely. The injured man had surgery for a torn rotator cuff. The case was settled before a lawsuit was filed.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Shoulder Injury
Truck/Commercial
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$250,000
County
Fulton County, GA
Resolved
2016

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Shoulder Injury
Accident Type
Truck/Commercial
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision

Settlement Context

This settlement of $250,000 is above the median of $60,000 for shoulder injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $24,061 to $250,000, based on 20 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On July 16, 2015, an individual was involved in an auto-big rig collision on I-285 in Atlanta, Georgia. The plaintiff's vehicle was traveling eastbound when it was rear-ended by a freight truck, operated by an employee of B & B Trucking. The impact propelled the plaintiff's vehicle into the car ahead. The defendant driver received a police citation at the scene for following too closely.

The plaintiff sustained a partial rotator cuff tear in the collision, which required surgical repair. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant trucking company's insurer to recover damages for the injuries.

The dispute was resolved through a pre-litigation settlement, with the plaintiff receiving $250,000. The settlement occurred after the claim was filed but before formal litigation began, suggesting the documented injury and the police citation contributed to the resolution.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Fulton County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

70
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Fulton County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case