700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was rear-ended by another driver at an intersection. The defendant admitted fault for the collision but disputed the severity of the injuries claimed. The jury determined that the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury from the crash.

One driver stopped for traffic and was rear-ended by another vehicle, causing a chain reaction. Later, a different driver collided with the injured person's vehicle at an intersection.

One driver hit another car from behind. The insurance company for the driver who was hit argued that the person was not permanently injured. The jury found that the person did not have a permanent injury and awarded $3,000 in economic damages.

One driver was involved in a rear-end collision with another driver near an intersection. The jury found the defendant driver was negligent and caused damage to the plaintiff. However, the jury also found that the plaintiff did not sustain a permanent injury from the accident.

On March 26, 1991, a passenger in a vehicle was rear-ended by another driver on a street in Naples. The driver who caused the collision was cited for faulty brakes and admitted fault. The injured passenger experienced neck pain and muscle issues.

One driver claimed that the other driver's negligence caused a rear-end collision. The injured person stated the collision resulted in permanent injuries. The other driver's insurance company argued that the injured person's own negligence, or the negligence of others, caused the crash. The insurance company also disputed the extent of the injuries.

One driver was stopped abruptly by a car in front of her. The driver behind her was unable to stop in time and rear-ended her vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries to her low back, neck, and left shoulder.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle that was stopped at a red light. The driver who caused the collision admitted fault for the accident but disputed that it caused permanent injuries. The final judgment was in favor of the defendant after a PIP set-off was applied.

One driver stopped their vehicle because a paramedic vehicle with sirens passed by. The other driver then rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The second driver argued the first driver stopped too soon, but the judge ruled in favor of the first driver on that point. The jury determined the injured person did not sustain a permanent injury.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle while it was stopped at a toll booth. The collision caused injuries to the neck and back. The defense questioned the diagnosis and existence of some injuries.

One driver's vehicle was hit from behind by the other driver's vehicle. The jury found the second driver caused the accident. However, they also found the injured person did not have a permanent injury from the crash.

One driver rear-ended another driver's vehicle at an intersection. The defendant admitted fault for the collision. The jury determined the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury.