One driver was stopped at a traffic light when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who hit the other vehicle alleged a phantom vehicle caused an abrupt stop, leading to the collision. The injured driver claimed post-concussion syndrome and an aggravation of a previous neck condition.
One driver was operating a vehicle when another driver, who was under the influence of alcohol and speeding, rear-ended her. The at-fault driver claimed a phantom vehicle pushed him into the injured driver's car. The injured driver had uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage with her own insurance company, which admitted liability during the trial.
One driver stopped for a previous collision and was rear-ended by the vehicle behind them. The impact caused injuries to the driver's neck. The case was settled.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, pushing it into a stopped truck. The driver of the rear vehicle admitted fault. The occupants of the middle vehicle claimed permanent injuries from the collision. The jury found that the occupants sustained permanent injuries and awarded damages against the driver who caused the initial collision.
One driver was traveling south on a highway when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver sought damages for low back pain and strain. The jury found the other driver negligent but determined the injured driver did not suffer a permanent injury.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle that had stopped. After the collision, the first vehicle would not start, and the injured person agreed to help with the mechanical problem. The vehicle moved, and the hood came down, crushing the tips of the injured person's fingers.
One driver was involved in a rear-end collision with another driver who did not have insurance. The injured driver filed a claim against their own insurance company. The insurance company disputed the cause and extent of the injuries. The injured driver sustained a shoulder injury that required surgery. The case went to trial, and the jury awarded damages. The case ultimately settled for a larger amount.
One driver was a passenger in a vehicle when the vehicle behind them allegedly rear-ended them. This caused the passenger's vehicle to strike another vehicle. The injured person suffered broken bones in their hand, requiring surgery and resulting in loss of strength.
One driver rear-ended another driver's vehicle on a highway. The injured driver claimed brain injuries affecting memory and concentration. The jury found that the injured driver did not sustain a permanent injury from the accident.
One driver was involved in a chain-reaction accident after a phantom vehicle stopped abruptly. This driver then struck the vehicle in front, and was subsequently hit from behind by another vehicle. The jury found the driver who hit the plaintiff from behind to be 100% negligent.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when another driver crashed into the back of her vehicle. The injured driver had uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage with her insurance company. The court ruled in favor of the injured driver on the issue of who was at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The second driver claimed they lost control due to a medical issue. The case involved injuries to the neck.
St. Lucie County • 2001
Geography
Where Florida Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Florida.
Key legal rules that affect how Florida car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar, effective 2023)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident (effective 2023)
Minimum Liability
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident / $10,000 property damage
Florida transitioned from a no-fault to an at-fault system in 2024. The state now uses modified comparative fault—if you are more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover damages.
The statute of limitations was reduced from 4 years to 2 years in 2023 under tort reform legislation.
Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage is no longer required for new policies, but existing policies may still include it during the transition period.
FAQ
Florida Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Florida case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Florida attorney for guidance specific to your situation.