700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver rear-ended another driver while stopped at a red light. The collision caused minimal property damage. The jury determined the injured driver did not sustain a permanent injury.

One driver alleged being rear-ended by another driver while stopped at a red light. The other driver claimed the first driver stopped abruptly to avoid a yellow light. Negligence was admitted, but comparative negligence was argued. The jury determined the injured person did not sustain a permanent injury from the incident.

One driver alleged that another driver was negligent in operating her vehicle and rear-ended a vehicle which in turn rear-ended the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff's uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier was involved. The jury found that the plaintiff did not sustain a permanent injury as a result of this accident.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle, causing a chain reaction that involved a third vehicle and a tree. The injured person suffered a torn meniscus requiring surgery. The defense argued the injury was not caused by the accident but by the injured person's weight.

One driver alleged that another driver swerved in front of them, causing a rear-end collision. The other driver claimed no one was present when they changed lanes. The injured driver sustained a right ankle sprain, breast contusion, and soft tissue injuries to their neck and lower back.

One driver's vehicle was hit from behind at an intersection. The injured driver alleged injuries from the crash. The jury determined the other driver's actions caused damage but found the injured driver did not suffer a permanent injury.

One driver rear-ended another driver at an intersection. The impact was minor, and fault was admitted. The jury found that the defendants' negligence caused the plaintiff's injury and that the injury was permanent.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle that was stopped at an intersection. The impact pushed the stopped vehicle into oncoming traffic, where it was struck again. The injured driver alleged the defendant was driving erratically before the initial collision.

One driver was traveling north on a highway when another driver's vehicle rear-ended the car behind them, pushing it into the first driver's car. The second driver admitted fault. The injured driver had back injuries. The jury found the second driver's actions caused damage, but the injured driver did not have a permanent injury. The case was later settled.

One driver's vehicle was hit from behind by an uninsured driver. The injured person had an insurance policy with the defendant for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. The defendant argued the injury was soft tissue and not related to the accident. The injured person had many chiropractic treatments after the crash.

One driver rear-ended a vehicle carrying a passenger. The passenger claimed serious and permanent injuries. The driver denied causing the injuries and claimed they were not permanent. The vehicle owner was also named as a defendant.

On February 16, 1990, one driver's vehicle was hit from behind by another driver's vehicle at an intersection. The injured person experienced neck and back pain, tingling down both arms, headaches, and pain radiating into their right leg.