700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

A person was involved in two separate car accidents. The first was a rear-end collision, and the second was a sideswipe collision. The person claimed injuries from both accidents, requiring surgery. Attorneys for the defendants argued about how damages should be apportioned between the two accidents.

One driver stopped at a red light and was hit from behind by another vehicle. The injured driver had insurance coverage with the defendant for uninsured/underinsured motorists. The jury determined the injured driver did not have a permanent injury from the crash.

One driver was stopped to make a left turn when the other driver rear-ended their vehicle. The driver who was hit sustained bruises and neck and shoulder pain. The jury found that the injured driver did not suffer a permanent injury.

One driver claimed permanent injuries from a rear-end collision with an uninsured driver. The collision happened on a city street. The other driver admitted fault for the crash but disputed the extent of the injured driver's injuries. The jury determined the injured driver sustained a permanent injury but awarded only past medical expenses.

One driver stopped suddenly at an intersection, causing the driver behind them to rear-end their vehicle. The injured driver claimed neck and back sprain. The jury determined the injury was not permanent.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle on a roadway intersection. The driver who was hit claimed serious personal injuries. The other driver denied responsibility. The jury found both drivers to be 50% negligent.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle on a road in Ft. Lauderdale. The jury found the defendant driver caused the accident. However, they also found the injured person did not have a permanent injury from the crash.

One driver was stopped behind a bus when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The jury found the second driver's actions caused the injury, but also found the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury.

One driver was rear-ended by another driver at an intersection. The injured driver hit his head and experienced headaches, neck pain, and dizziness. The case involved determining causation and the permanency of the injury.

One driver's vehicle struck the back of another driver's vehicle at an intersection. The first driver admitted fault for the collision. The jury determined that the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury from the crash.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended them. The collision occurred in Boca Raton. The jury determined the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury from the accident.

One driver was traveling on a road in Naples and slowed for traffic at an intersection. The other driver allegedly failed to stop and rear-ended the first driver's vehicle. The injured driver had pre-existing neck and back problems and was reportedly disabled at the time of the crash.