700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle in Ft. Lauderdale. The driver who was rear-ended stated they stopped because the vehicle in front of them stopped for a pedestrian. The other driver claimed the stop was sudden and unexpected. The case involved injuries to the shoulder.

One driver filed suit after being rear-ended by another vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendant negligently caused the collision. The defendants denied the allegations and contended the plaintiff caused the accident by pulling in front of the defendant while switching lanes.

One driver was operating a vehicle north on Biscayne Boulevard in Miami when they were rear-ended by another vehicle. Liability for the collision was admitted, but the cause of the injuries was disputed. The injured driver sustained a lumbar sprain/strain and an aggravation of a compression fracture to their lower back. The defense argued that there was no property damage to the plaintiff's vehicle and that the plaintiff did not seek medical attention for a week after the accident. The defense also alleged that the compression fracture was aggravated when the plaintiff fell off a bridge.

One driver rear-ended another driver's vehicle at an intersection. The collision caused extensive damage to the injured driver's car. Liability for the crash was admitted.

One driver was rear-ended by another driver at an intersection. The collision caused injuries to the first driver's back and neck. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing.

One driver was traveling and stopped for a yellow light when her vehicle was struck in the rear by another driver. The driver who was hit alleged they were stopping properly. The other driver claimed a third vehicle startled the first driver, causing them to brake suddenly. The jury found the striking driver negligent and that the injured driver sustained a permanent injury.

One driver stopped at an intersection when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. The driver who was hit alleged the other driver was negligent. The other driver denied negligence and claimed the injured driver was also at fault and did not wear a seatbelt.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle near an intersection. The jury determined the injured person did not have a permanent injury from the crash. The case was settled after the verdict.

One vehicle rear-ended another vehicle, causing injuries to a passenger. The passenger sued the owner and driver of the striking vehicle for negligence. Medical experts testified for both sides regarding the passenger's condition and the extent of injuries.

One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended her vehicle. Her car was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The injured driver claimed a herniated cervical disc.

One driver rear-ended another driver's stopped vehicle. The impact caused the plaintiff's vehicle to go off the road and into a guardrail, totaling the car. Liability was admitted.

One driver hit another vehicle from behind. The first driver admitted fault for the collision. The case proceeded to determine damages and causation. The injured driver claimed the impact caused a herniated disc and carpal tunnel syndrome, requiring surgery and resulting in a permanent injury. The other driver argued the disc condition was pre-existing and unrelated to the accident, and also denied the carpal tunnel syndrome was caused by the collision. A jury awarded damages for a permanent injury.