Verdictly
Settlement
Hillsborough County • 2005

Tampa Jury Issues Verdict in Rear-End Collision

One driver rear-ended another vehicle at an intersection. The injured person had right shoulder, cervical, and lumbar injuries.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Shoulder Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$423
County
Hillsborough County, FL
Resolved
2005

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Shoulder Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $423 is below the median of $60,000 for shoulder injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $24,061 to $250,000, based on 20 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On November 13, 2002, a vehicle driven by one defendant and owned by two other defendants rear-ended the plaintiff's vehicle at the intersection of 46th Street North and Fletcher Avenue East in Tampa. The plaintiff subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit, seeking damages for injuries sustained in the collision.

During the proceedings, both sides presented testimony from multiple medical experts, indicating a dispute over the nature and extent of the plaintiff's alleged injuries. Prior to trial, the defendants had offered $50,000 to settle the case, while the plaintiff had submitted settlement proposals totaling $167,500. In closing arguments, the plaintiff's counsel suggested a total damages award of $275,000. Defense counsel, in contrast, proposed an award of less than $500, which reportedly covered only the plaintiff's emergency room bill and one day of lost wages.

The jury deliberated for approximately forty minutes. The available record did not include information regarding the final verdict or judgment in the case.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Hillsborough County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2005, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

35
/100
Potentially Unfair

This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to understand your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Hillsborough County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case