Verdictly
Settlement
Santa Rosa County • 1997

Pace, Florida Jury Issues Verdict in Fatal Rear-End Collision

A driver for a construction equipment company was picking up a dozer. He stopped his tractor-trailer on the highway to get the dozer from a nearby field. The driver slowed down without using his brakes, so his brake lights did not activate. The decedent, who was following behind, collided with the rear of the tractor-trailer and suffered fatal injuries.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Wrongful Death
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Wrongful Death Injuries

Wrongful death claims arise when a car accident fatality is caused by another party's negligence. These cases compensate surviving family members for their losses and the decedent's pain and suffering.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$250,000
County
Santa Rosa County, FL
Resolved
1997

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Wrongful Death
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $250,000 is below the median of $1,850,000 for wrongful death cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $504,000 to $3,020,000, based on 41 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On May 17, 1994, a tractor-trailer driven by a defendant and owned by a construction equipment company stopped on Quintette Road (County Road 184) in Pace, Florida, to retrieve equipment. The driver slowed by downshifting, which did not activate the brake lights, and stopped in the traffic lane, obstructing the roadway. A vehicle following directly behind the tractor-trailer collided with its rear, resulting in fatal injuries to the driver of the following vehicle.

The plaintiff, representing the deceased, filed a lawsuit against both the driver and the company. The plaintiff alleged the defendants were negligent, claiming the trailer lacked proper reflective materials or lighting, was excessively dirty, and the driver failed to move onto the shoulder, signal a turn, or use brakes to activate the brake lights. The lawsuit also asserted that the driver's trip planning and prolonged stop on the highway were negligent.

Additionally, the plaintiff alleged multiple violations of Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, including claims that the driver had not completed required road or written examinations, lacked an annual driver's certificate, and had not undergone required annual reviews of driving records, controlled substance testing, medical examinations, or inquiries into previous employment. The provided record does not specify the outcome of the case.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Santa Rosa County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 1997, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

28
/100
Potentially Unfair

This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to understand your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Santa Rosa County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case