Verdictly
Settlement
Orange County • 1997

Orange County Rear-End Collision Settles for Undisclosed Amount

One driver claimed injury to her left breast and a ruptured breast implant when her vehicle was hit from behind. The collision occurred near an intersection. The other driver did not dispute fault for the accident. The case settled before a verdict.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Facial Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$70,000
County
Orange County, FL
Resolved
1997

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Facial Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Overview

On October 14, 1994, a vehicle collision occurred near the intersection of S.R. 436 and Oleander Drive in Orange County, Florida. The plaintiff, whose vehicle was rear-ended by the defendant, claimed she sustained a ruptured left breast implant due to the shoulder harness catching at the point of impact. The defendant did not dispute negligence in causing the accident.

Prior to trial, a significant dispute arose over the admissibility of evidence concerning the plaintiff's occupation. The plaintiff, who had dismissed her claim for lost earnings, sought to prevent the defense from presenting testimony or evidence about her work as a nude dancer, arguing its prejudicial effect outweighed any probative value. The defense contended the information was relevant to the plaintiff's claims for pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, embarrassment, lack of function, and scarring, given her voluntary election to perform nude. A judge granted the plaintiff's motion to exclude the evidence. The case later settled for an undisclosed amount, following a defense offer of $40,502 against a plaintiff demand of $100,000.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Orange County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 1997, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

69
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Orange County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case