Verdictly
Settlement
Brevard County • 1997

Indialantic, FL Jury Issues Verdict in Rear-End Collision

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The driver of the second vehicle alleged the first driver stopped unexpectedly. The defendant disputed the cause of the injury, citing the minor impact and the injured person's active lifestyle.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Shoulder Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$60,000
County
Brevard County, FL
Resolved
1997

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Shoulder Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $60,000 is near the median of $60,000 for shoulder injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $24,061 to $250,000, based on 20 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On May 8, 1995, in Indialantic, Florida, a vehicle carrying a seat-belted plaintiff as a passenger was rear-ended by a defendant's vehicle after passing an intersection. The collision resulted in minimal damage. The defendant alleged that the driver of the plaintiff's vehicle made a sudden and unexpected stop, a claim the plaintiff disputed.

The defendant also challenged the causation of any alleged injuries, citing the minimal impact of the collision and the plaintiff's regular surfing activities both before and after the incident. The plaintiff presented medical expert opinions from specialists in orthopedics, neurology, and chiropractic. The available record did not specify the legal claims filed, the nature of any alleged injuries, or the resolution of the case.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Brevard County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 1997, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

92
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Brevard County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case