Verdictly
Settlement
Broward County • 2001

Florida Jury Concludes Two Motor Vehicle Collisions

One driver alleged that her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle while she was making a left turn. In a separate incident, she was a passenger in a vehicle that was rear-ended by another vehicle while stopped in traffic. The injuries sustained in these accidents were described as a fluid cavitation in the spinal cord, resulting in neurological deficits and pain.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Spinal Cord Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Spinal Cord Injury Injuries

Spinal cord injuries are among the most catastrophic outcomes of car accidents, potentially resulting in partial or complete paralysis. These injuries require extensive medical care and significantly impact quality of life.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$122,500
County
Broward County, FL
Resolved
2001

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Spinal Cord Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $122,500 is below the median of $1,300,000 for spinal cord injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $492,728 to $30,000,000, based on 13 cases in our database.

Case Overview

The plaintiff alleged injuries stemming from two separate motor vehicle incidents. The first occurred on May 9, 2001, in Coral Springs, Florida, when a defendant's vehicle reportedly struck the rear of the plaintiff's car while she made a left turn at an intersection. The second incident took place on August 30, 2003, in Plantation, Florida, when a vehicle driven by a second defendant and owned by a third rear-ended the plaintiff's stopped vehicle, where she was a passenger. The plaintiff's uninsured motorist carrier and the carriers for the defendants were identified in the record. No details regarding the outcome of the case were available.

Understanding This Case

  • Spinal cord injuries are typically permanent, though some incomplete injuries may see partial recovery. Life expectancy may be reduced, and quality of life is significantly impacted.
  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Broward County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2001, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

70
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Broward County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case