Verdictly
Settlement
Duval County • 2005

Clay County, Florida Jury Finds Negligence in Fatal Rear-End Crash

One driver was operating a tractor trailer south on U.S. 301. The other driver, also in a tractor trailer, was in the same lane. The second driver allegedly changed lanes directly into the path of the first driver, causing a rear-end collision. The injured person was survived by his wife.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Wrongful Death
Truck/Commercial
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Wrongful Death Injuries

Wrongful death claims arise when a car accident fatality is caused by another party's negligence. These cases compensate surviving family members for their losses and the decedent's pain and suffering.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$1,545,000
County
Duval County, FL
Resolved
2005

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Wrongful Death
Accident Type
Truck/Commercial
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $1,545,000 is near the median of $1,850,000 for wrongful death cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $504,000 to $3,020,000, based on 41 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On June 24, 2002, a collision occurred in Clay County, Florida, involving two tractor-trailers traveling south on U.S. 301 at its intersection with S.R. 218. The plaintiff alleged that an employee of the defendant, operating the defendant's vehicle, changed lanes directly into the path of the decedent's tractor-trailer. This action caused the decedent's vehicle to rear-end the defendant's vehicle, resulting in fatal injuries to the decedent.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming negligence against the defendant. During the proceedings, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from specialists in accident reconstruction, engineering, and economics. Prior to trial, the defendant rejected a $600,000 settlement proposal from the plaintiff. Post-trial motions were pending following the trial.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Duval County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2005, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

70
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Duval County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case