Verdictly
Settlement
Brevard County • 2003

Brevard County, Florida Rear-End Collision Trial Concludes

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while stopped at a red light. A second accident occurred when the same driver was rear-ended again while stopped at an intersection. The driver underwent multiple surgeries for back and neck injuries.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$727,500
County
Brevard County, FL
Resolved
2003

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $727,500 is above the median of $93,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $30,000 to $450,000, based on 103 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff was involved in two separate rear-end collisions in Brevard County, Florida. The first incident occurred on April 24, 2002, in Indialantic, when the plaintiff's vehicle was struck from behind by a minor driver while attempting a right turn. The defendant driver alleged the plaintiff had stopped short after initially proceeding into traffic. The second incident took place on April 28, 2004, in Melbourne, where a different defendant rear-ended the plaintiff's vehicle while it was stopped at a red light in a left-turn lane. The second defendant claimed to have thought the traffic signal had turned green and that the plaintiff's vehicle had begun to move.

The plaintiff alleged sustaining injuries from both collisions, with back problems primarily attributed to the first accident and neck issues becoming significant after the second. Medical experts in orthopedic surgery, neurology, pain management, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and chiropractic orthopedics provided testimony for the plaintiff. Defense experts, including orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons, also provided evaluations. The parties debated the extent and indivisibility of the plaintiff's injuries across the two incidents. The available record does not specify the outcome of the case, such as a verdict, judgment, or settlement.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Brevard County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2003, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

42
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Brevard County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case