Verdictly
Settlement
Arapahoe County • 2015

Arapahoe County Promissory Note Dispute Settles for $45,000

One person claimed they loaned money to two others who promised to repay it with interest. The borrowers made some payments but then stopped. The lender took possession of vehicles as collateral. The lender filed a lawsuit for non-payment, breach of contract, and other claims. The borrowers argued the contract was invalid. The parties reached a settlement.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Other Accident
Civil Procedure

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$45,000
County
Arapahoe County, CO
Resolved
2015

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Other
Case Type
Civil Procedure, Contracts Law, Governments

Settlement Context

This settlement of $45,000 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff filed a bankruptcy action in the District Court for the District of Colorado, Arapahoe County, alleging that two defendants failed to repay a $30,000 loan. The plaintiff claimed the loan was memorialized by a promissory note, which included terms for repayment and identified a 2009 Ford pick-up truck and a 2008 Infinity FX3 automobile as collateral. The plaintiff asserted that the defendants made an initial $2,000 payment but no further payments. The lawsuit sought judgment for the principal amount due, pre- and post-judgment interest, attorney fees, and costs, alleging non-payment of the note, breach of contract, and quantum meruit.

The defendants responded, asserting that the promissory note was null and void. The plaintiff denied these allegations and raised affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, failure of consideration, fraud, and statute of limitations. The parties subsequently reached a settlement during a mediation conference. The court then granted the settlement, awarding $45,000 to the plaintiff.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Arapahoe County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

45
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Arapahoe County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case