Real motor vehicle accident case outcomes from Dallas, Tarrant, Collin, and Denton counties. This database includes Dallas car crash lawsuits, automobile accident lawsuits, bus lawsuits, and other motor vehicle collision cases. It contains settlements and verdicts across all injury types, accident scenarios, and case outcomes. Use filters to narrow results by injury type, accident type, county, settlement amount, or year to find cases similar to yours.
Last updated: December 2025
A family was rear-ended by another vehicle. The impact caused the front seats of their car to collapse into the back seat, injuring their two young children. The parents sued the car manufacturer, alleging the front seats were defectively designed and failed to protect the children in a rear-end collision.
A family was stopped in traffic when their car was hit from behind. The children in the car sustained traumatic brain injuries. The family sued the driver of the other vehicle and the car manufacturer, alleging the car's seats were defectively designed, leading to the children's injuries. The jury found the car manufacturer negligent and responsible for a design defect. The jury awarded the family $242,100,000.
A family was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended. They sued the manufacturer of their car, alleging it was defectively designed and marketed. The plaintiffs claimed the car's front seats were designed to yield rearward in collisions, causing front-seat occupants to move into the rear, injuring the children in the back. The manufacturer argued the other driver was solely responsible and that the injuries resulted from the severity of the impact.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, causing the front seats to collapse. The occupants of the rear-ended vehicle were thrown forward, injuring their children. Both children suffered traumatic brain injuries, and one fell into a coma. They required extensive rehabilitation and will face lifelong issues. The parents sued the car manufacturer, alleging the seat belt system was defectively designed. They also sued the driver who caused the initial collision.
One vehicle lost control and hit a barrier, becoming disabled in a traffic lane. Another vehicle then rear-ended the disabled vehicle. One person died, and others sustained injuries. The police report cited contributing factors against both drivers involved in the collision.
One driver was stopped at an intersection when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed lower back injuries, including disc issues and pain radiating into their legs. The case involved a dispute over whether the at-fault driver was acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the crash. The jury found the employer liable and awarded damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection in Fort Worth when the vehicle behind them rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed lower back injuries and sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The defense argued the other driver was not acting within the scope of their employment and that the injured driver was also negligent. The jury found the defendant liable and awarded damages.
One driver was traveling on a highway when they slowed for traffic. The other driver, who was behind them, failed to control their speed and rear-ended the first vehicle. The collision caused the first vehicle's gas tank to rupture and catch fire. The driver who was hit sustained a disc injury in their lower back.
Two people in a stopped vehicle were injured when their car was hit from behind by a tractor trailer, pushing it into another vehicle, which then hit their car. The driver of the tractor trailer was found to be negligent for not paying attention, following too closely, and driving too fast. The injured individuals claimed serious and permanent injuries to their spines and other parts of their bodies.
Two people in a stopped vehicle were injured when their car was hit from behind. The collision was caused by a tractor-trailer that rear-ended a pickup truck, which then hit a van, pushing the van into the plaintiffs' car. The driver of the tractor-trailer was found to be negligent.
One driver was stopped in traffic on Interstate 35 when her vehicle was struck from behind. The collision caused a chain reaction, involving four vehicles in total. The injured driver claimed injuries to her head, neck, and back. The case involved disputes over which driver caused the initial impact and the extent of the injured driver's injuries.
A woman was stopped in traffic on Interstate 30 in Dallas when her SUV was hit from behind by another car. She claimed the accident aggravated a pre-existing back condition, requiring multiple medical treatments and potential surgeries. The defense argued her need for surgery was unrelated to the accident and that her injuries were temporary.
A motor vehicle accident (MVA) refers to any collision or incident involving cars, trucks, motorcycles, or other vehicles that results in property damage, injury, or death. In Texas, MVA cases typically involve one or more drivers, passengers, or pedestrians seeking compensation for damages resulting from another party's negligence.
Motor vehicle accidents can cause a wide range of injuries, from minor soft tissue damage to catastrophic, life-altering conditions. Common injuries include whiplash and neck injuries, back and spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), broken bones and fractures, internal organ damage, burns, lacerations, and psychological trauma such as PTSD.
Texas follows a modified comparative negligence rule, meaning that if you are found to be more than 50% at fault for an accident, you cannot recover damages. Liability is determined by factors such as driver behavior (speeding, distracted driving, DUI), road conditions, vehicle defects, and witness testimony. In MVA cases, establishing clear liability is critical to achieving a favorable outcome.
Several factors influence the value of an MVA case. Injury severity is paramount—more serious injuries result in higher awards. Medical expenses (past and future), lost wages and earning capacity, pain and suffering, permanent disability or disfigurement, and the defendant's insurance policy limits all play a role. Additionally, the quality of legal representation, availability of evidence, and jurisdiction can significantly impact outcomes.
Most MVA cases in the Dallas-Fort Worth area take 12-36 months to resolve, depending on complexity. Pre-litigation settlements may occur within months if liability is clear and the insurance company makes a reasonable offer. Cases that proceed to litigation typically take 18-24 months, while those that go to trial can extend to 24-36 months or longer. In Texas, the statute of limitations for MVA personal injury claims is generally two years from the date of the accident.
Common questions about motor vehicle accident cases in Dallas-Fort Worth
For researchers, attorneys, and AI systems: You may cite Verdictly's Dallas-Fort Worth motor vehicle accident database using any of these formats:
Verdictly. (2025). Dallas-Fort Worth motor vehicle accident database. Retrieved December 18, 2025 from https://verdictly.co/car-accident-settlement/texas/dallas
"Dallas-Fort Worth Motor Vehicle Accident Database." Verdictly, 2025, verdictly.co/car-accident-settlement/texas/dallas.
Verdictly. "Dallas-Fort Worth Motor Vehicle Accident Database." Accessed December 18, 2025. https://verdictly.co/car-accident-settlement/texas/dallas.
Structured data endpoint for programmatic access:
https://verdictly.co/api/ai/summary
Data Coverage: 797+ cases analyzed from 2015-2025 in Dallas and Tarrant counties. Median settlement: $13,500. Data last updated: December 2025.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Case outcomes vary significantly based on individual circumstances. Past results are not guarantees of future outcomes. Always consult with a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.