Fort Worth Jury Awards $487,637 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at an intersection in Fort Worth when the vehicle behind them rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed lower back injuries and sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The defense argued the other driver was not acting within the scope of their employment and that the injured driver was also negligent. The jury found the defendant liable and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $487,637
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $487,637 is above the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On September 29, 2015, in Fort Worth, Texas, a property damage appraiser was driving an SUV when it was rear-ended by another SUV at an Interstate 820 exit. The plaintiff, who claimed lower back injuries, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver and the driver's employer, a rental car company. The plaintiff alleged the defendant driver was negligent and that the employer was vicariously liable because the driver was acting within the course and scope of employment. Claims against the individual driver were dismissed before trial.
At trial, the plaintiff testified that the vehicle was stopped at the time of the impact. The plaintiff's counsel argued that the defendant driver's use of the company vehicle, which was being taken home for cleaning and fueling for the next workday, along with performing job duties from home, constituted acting within the scope of employment. The defense contended that the accident occurred after business hours while the defendant was commuting home, thus arguing against vicarious liability. The defense also argued the plaintiff was negligent, asserting that the plaintiff stopped suddenly without reason after starting to turn.
The plaintiff claimed multiple disc injuries in the lower back, radiating pain, and underwent physical therapy, injections, and decompression surgery. The plaintiff reported persistent pain and limitations on activities, seeking over $330,000 for past and future medical expenses, along with damages for pain, impairment, and disfigurement. The defense disputed the necessity and cost of the surgery, highlighted a delay in the plaintiff's initial medical treatment, noted a lack of treatment in the years leading to trial, and introduced evidence of the plaintiff's travel to suggest exaggerated injuries. The defense also pointed to moderate vehicle damage and the financial arrangement with the plaintiff's surgeon.
After a three-day trial, a jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined that the driver was within the course and scope of employment, making the employer vicariously liable. The jury found the plaintiff was not negligent. The plaintiff was awarded $487,637 in damages.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2020, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.