Texas Jury Awards $225K in Pothole Crash Negligence
One driver lost control of his pickup truck after hitting potholes and drove off the road. A short time later, another driver also hit potholes, lost control, and their vehicle rolled over, striking the first driver's vehicle and then the first driver. The first driver sustained a broken ankle when his truck was pushed into him.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $225,000
- County
- Reeves County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Leg / Foot Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $225,000 is below the median of $335,000 for leg / foot injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $233,863 to $1,950,000, based on 16 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On March 10, 2015, two separate vehicle incidents occurred on Ranch to Market Road 652 in Loving County, Texas. In the first incident, a welder, driving a pickup truck, struck potholes, lost control, and veered off the road. Minutes later, a service technician, driving a Ford F-550 with a steel tank, also struck potholes, lost control, and rolled over, striking the first vehicle. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the welder, who had exited his truck, causing him a fractured ankle. The service technician sustained bruises.
The plaintiffs sued the state Department of Transportation under the Texas Tort Claims Act, alleging the potholes constituted a "special defect" and that the department's failure to adequately warn drivers of recurring hazardous road conditions created a false sense of security. Witnesses testified to the road's poor condition and numerous prior complaints to the department. The defense asserted sovereign immunity and contended the potholes were an open and obvious condition, for which an adequate warning sign had been posted miles away. The department denied the "special defect" claim and argued the accidents were due to the plaintiffs' own negligence, citing testimony from an accident reconstruction expert that potholes do not affect vehicle stability.
The trial took place in Reeves County, following a venue change from Loving County. The court ruled that the potholes did not constitute a "special defect," instructing the jury to apply a licensee standard of care. The jury found the state Department of Transportation negligent for both incidents. For the first incident, the jury apportioned 75% of the fault to the department and 25% to the first plaintiff. For the second, they assigned 60% fault to the department and 40% to the second plaintiff. The jury awarded a total of $225,000 in damages, which were then reduced by comparative fault. The first plaintiff received $131,250, and the second plaintiff received $30,000.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Reeves County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Reeves County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.