Sugar Land Jury Awards $270,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped her vehicle in traffic and was rear-ended by another car. The impact pushed her vehicle into the car in front of her. The injured driver sustained a foot injury and a torn tendon, requiring surgery and physical therapy. She later experienced a fall and subsequent injuries to her wrist and knee, which she attributed to her initial foot injury.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $270,000
- County
- Fort Bend County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Leg / Foot Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $270,000 is near the median of $335,000 for leg / foot injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $233,863 to $1,950,000, based on 16 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A homemaker sustained injuries in a multi-vehicle rear-end collision on November 17, 2009, in Sugar Land, Texas. After her vehicle stopped in traffic, it was rear-ended by a Toyota 4Runner. The Toyota was then struck by another SUV, pushing the plaintiff's vehicle into the one ahead. The plaintiff alleged the driver of the Toyota that rear-ended her switched places with a passenger after the collision. The plaintiff suffered a right foot fracture and a torn right peroneal tendon.
The plaintiff initially sued the drivers of the Toyota, who settled for their $25,000 policy limit. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against her own underinsured motorist insurer, Allstate Indemnity Co., seeking benefits. She claimed the initial rear-ending driver was negligent by failing to keep a proper lookout, driving too fast, failing to control speed, following too closely, and failing to brake or turn. The insurer initially contended that the driver of the third vehicle was at fault, an opinion stated in the police report, but that officer's opinion was excluded from evidence at trial.
During the trial, the insurer conceded that the initial rear-ending driver was negligent. The plaintiff presented evidence of her injuries, including surgical repair of her tendon, ongoing "drop foot," and mild gait impairment, which she attributed to a subsequent fall in 2015. Her treating podiatrist testified about the need for potential future surgeries due to persistent pain. The defense disputed the connection between the original injury and the 2015 fall, questioned the extent of ongoing pain, and challenged the surgeon's qualifications regarding future care.
A Sugar Land jury deliberated for four hours before finding the initial rear-ending driver negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $270,000 in damages for past and future medical costs, physical impairment, and pain and anguish. After applying a $25,000 credit from the initial liability settlement and $2,500 in personal injury protection payments, the net award totaled $242,500. However, due to the plaintiff's underinsured motorist policy limit of $100,000, that was the maximum recoverable amount in this lawsuit. According to plaintiff's counsel, the plaintiff planned to file a separate action against Allstate Indemnity Co. for alleged bad faith and violations of the Texas Insurance Code.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Fort Bend County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Fort Bend County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.