Queens Auto Collision Negligence Settles for $875,000
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle was struck by another car. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent for ignoring a stop sign. The injured driver underwent multiple surgeries for disc herniations, nerve impingement, and shoulder injuries. They claimed ongoing pain, weakness, and inability to perform daily activities or work.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $875,000
- County
- Dallas County, NY
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This settlement of $875,000 is above the median of $100,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $37,000 to $800,000, based on 23 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In December 2016, a collision occurred in Long Island City, Queens, when a food cart operator's SUV was struck by another vehicle at an intersection. The plaintiff, driving westbound on 48th Avenue, claimed his vehicle was hit on the right side by the defendant's car, which was traveling on 36th Street. The plaintiff alleged the defendant ignored a stop sign governing entry to the intersection, while the plaintiff's path was not controlled by a traffic device. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging negligence by the defendant. A motion for summary judgment on liability was granted in favor of the plaintiff, and the case proceeded to address damages.
The plaintiff claimed to have suffered injuries to his back, neck, and shoulder, including aggravation of pre-existing degenerative spinal conditions, disc herniations, and multiple tears in his right shoulder. He underwent several surgeries, including arthroscopic shoulder surgery and two spinal procedures (microdiscectomy and a discectomy with other spinal interventions), in addition to approximately three years of conservative treatment. The plaintiff sought recovery for past and future medical expenses, past and future lost earnings, and damages for pain and suffering, asserting that his injuries resulted in residual pain, weakness, reduced range of motion, and an inability to perform his job duties.
The defense contended that the collision was minor and could not have caused the extensive injuries claimed by the plaintiff. A defense expert radiologist opined that post-accident scans did not show a herniated disc and suggested any confirmed injuries stemmed from a prior motor-vehicle accident in 2001. The parties ultimately reached a pretrial settlement totaling $875,000. The defendant's insurer tendered its primary policy limit of $500,000 and paid an additional $375,000 from an excess policy.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.