Manhattan Jury Awards $90,000 in Serious Injury Taxi Collision
A woman was struck by a taxi in Manhattan. She claimed injuries to her back, knees, and neck. The taxi driver's owner was sued for negligence. The woman alleged the taxi driver resumed driving while blocking a crosswalk, causing her to fall onto the taxi's hood and get pinned between the taxi and a van. The defense claimed minimal contact occurred and injuries were pre-existing. The jury found the taxi liable and the woman sustained a serious injury.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $200,000
- County
- Dallas County, NY
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Bulging Disc, Lumbar, Bulging Disc
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $200,000 is near the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On July 13, 2010, a plaintiff was struck by or collided with a taxi on Fifth Avenue, at its intersection with 50th Street in Manhattan. The plaintiff alleged the incident caused injuries to her back, knees, and neck. She subsequently sued the taxi's owner, Expedited Taxi Corp., alleging the driver was negligent in operating the vehicle and that the corporation was vicariously liable for the driver's actions.
During a summary jury trial, the plaintiff contended the incident occurred in a crosswalk, where the taxi was initially stopped, blocking pedestrians. She claimed the driver suddenly resumed travel upon noticing a police officer, striking her with the front of the vehicle. The plaintiff stated she fell onto the taxi's hood, and her knees became pinned between the taxi and a preceding van. She sought approximately $200,000 for past medical expenses and $150,000 for past pain and suffering, claiming injuries including knee derangement, meniscus tears, herniated and bulging spinal discs, and associated pain and limitation of motion requiring arthroscopic knee surgery and physical therapy. Defense counsel countered that the plaintiff was not struck by the taxi, but that her pants caught on the license plate, resulting in minor contact. The defense also argued that the plaintiff's claimed injuries were degenerative or not "serious" under the no-fault law, noting a delay in the diagnosis of her knee conditions.
The parties entered a high/low stipulation that limited damages to a maximum of $90,000 and a minimum of $10,000. The jury found Expedited Taxi liable for the incident and determined that the plaintiff had sustained a "serious injury," specifically finding permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member and significant limitation of use of a body function or system. The jury awarded total damages of $200,000, but due to the high/low stipulation, the plaintiff recovered $90,000.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.