Houston Jury Awards $107,390.99 in Motor Vehicle Collision
A driver pulled out from a restaurant and struck a vehicle, which then hit the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff claimed injuries to his neck and lower back, including disc bulges and herniations. He sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, and impairment. The defense argued that the plaintiff delayed treatment and that his claimed damages were excessive.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $107,391
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2024
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- back, lower back, herniated disc
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $107,391 is near the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In Houston, Texas, a traffic collision occurred on May 27, 2021, on Farm to Market Road 1960. A defendant driver pulled out from a fast-food restaurant and struck a westbound vehicle, which then collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The court subsequently granted a directed verdict on liability against the defendant.
The plaintiff, a 51-year-old warehouse supervisor, initially refused an ambulance but sought medical attention eight days later. The plaintiff claimed a 1-millimeter cervical disc bulge and a 2-millimeter lumbar disc herniation. Treatment included visits to a family practitioner, a chiropractor for physical therapy, and a pain management doctor who performed a bilateral lumbar medial branch block. The plaintiff's last treatment occurred about three months after the accident. The plaintiff testified that the injuries caused pain and limited participation in hobbies like fishing, gardening, and assisting with lifting heavy boxes. The plaintiff sought a total of $107,390.99 for past medical expenses, past and future physical pain, and past and future physical impairment.
The defense emphasized the delay in the plaintiff's initial treatment and noted that the plaintiff had told an investigating officer of no injury at the scene. The defense also pointed out that the plaintiff's last treatment was approximately three years before the trial. For non-economic damages, the defense argued for no future damages and contended that the amounts sought for past damages were excessive. The defense further disputed a portion of the pain management bill, asserting the plaintiff received only one injection despite being billed for two, seeking an $8,000 reduction. Plaintiff's counsel maintained that two injections, one on each side, were administered.
After a two-day trial and 30 hours of deliberation, the jury returned a 12-0 verdict, awarding the plaintiff $107,390.99. The jury's award matched the total damages sought by the plaintiff.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2024, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.