Arlington Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $23,887 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped on an entrance ramp and was rear-ended by the vehicle behind them. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries including herniated discs and sprains. The driver of the second vehicle was uninsured, and the occupants sought uninsured motorist benefits from their own insurance company. The defense argued that the impact was minor and that the injuries were pre-existing or exaggerated.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $24,763
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $24,763 is near the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On May 27, 2012, a rear-end collision occurred on an entrance ramp in the 2200 block of South Watson Road in Arlington, Texas. The plaintiff driver, operating a 2005 Honda Accord, had stopped on the ramp to merge onto East Pioneer Parkway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a 2004 Chevrolet Impala driven by an uninsured defendant. A police report identified following too closely as a contributing factor in the incident. The plaintiff driver and their passenger claimed various injuries, including herniated discs and sprains, and sought uninsured motorist benefits from their insurer.
The plaintiffs sued the uninsured defendant for negligence, alleging failure to maintain a proper lookout, follow at a safe distance, control speed, and avoid the collision. They also sued their insurer, Allstate Texas Lloyd's Inc., for uninsured motorist benefits. The plaintiff driver stated she had stopped on the ramp to wait for a break in traffic. The uninsured defendant did not appear in court. The insurer denied that the uninsured defendant was negligent, arguing that there was no traffic on East Pioneer Parkway and that the plaintiff driver braked without cause. The insurer also contended that the impact was minor and could not have caused the claimed injuries.
Both plaintiffs underwent chiropractic and medical treatment for several months. The defense presented expert testimony from a chiropractor who disputed the credibility of the plaintiff driver's injuries and questioned the necessity, duration, and billing of the treatments, suggesting pre-existing conditions. The expert similarly opined that the passenger's complaints were subjective and linked to pre-existing degenerative disc disease. Before trial, the insurer settled the chiropractor's bills for a reduced amount, which prevented the plaintiffs from introducing those specific bills as evidence. The plaintiffs sought damages for past medical bills, lost earnings, and pain and suffering.
A jury found the uninsured defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiffs a total of $24,762.74 in damages for past medical costs, lost earnings, and pain and suffering. After accounting for prejudgment interest, taxable costs, and an offset for previously paid personal injury protection benefits, the final judgment totaled $23,887.03. The jury's award, while finding negligence, was less than the total damages the plaintiffs had sought.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.