Back Strain / Soft Tissue Settlements:
Real Case Outcomes & Data

A train struck a vehicle carrying four occupants at a railroad crossing. The collision occurred because a parked train blocked the view of the approaching train, and the crossing gates were down. The occupants sustained various injuries, and one occupant died as a result of the crash. The jury found the railroad company, the vehicle's driver, and the driver's employer negligent.

One driver was traveling north on a highway with a passenger when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. This caused a chain reaction, and the plaintiffs' vehicle struck two other cars. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their back and neck.

One driver made an unsafe lane change, causing the vehicle behind them to rear-end them. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the one in front. The driver who was rear-ended sustained serious injuries and sought compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering. The defendants argued the other driver was at fault or that third parties caused the damages. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.

A driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident on a freeway. The collision occurred when one driver made an unsafe lane change, and another driver, operating a tractor-trailer, failed to control their speed and rear-ended the first driver's vehicle. This pushed the first driver's vehicle into the rear of the vehicle that changed lanes. The driver sustained serious injuries requiring medical treatment.

A driver stopped at a red light was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to her neck, back, and hips, requiring multiple surgeries and ongoing pain management. The other driver's employer was also named as a defendant. The defense argued the plaintiff's injuries were from subsequent incidents or pre-existing conditions.

A van carrying nine passengers, including seven minors, was traveling in Idaho when the driver lost control of the bus. The passengers sustained injuries in the resulting collision. Lawsuits were filed alleging negligence and strict liability. A jury awarded the plaintiffs a significant sum, finding the manufacturer fully at fault.

One driver was operating an ATV when it lost control and crashed into a yard office, injuring the driver. The injured person claimed the employer failed to provide a safe workplace and proper training. The employer argued the incident was not covered by FELA. A jury found the employer's negligence caused the injuries.

One driver collided with the rear of another vehicle. The driver in the rear vehicle alleged serious injuries to their neck, back, head, shoulders, legs, and arms. The collision was attributed to the negligence of the driver and owner of the other vehicle. A jury awarded damages to the injured driver.

One driver slowed to make a left turn and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The injured driver sought treatment for neck and back injuries. The jury found the second driver solely at fault for the collision.

One driver was heading north on a freeway when a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction struck them head on. The occupants of the first vehicle sustained multiple injuries. The driver of the second vehicle was allegedly intoxicated and driving the wrong way. The case involved claims against the other driver and a bar for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person. The jury found the bar not negligent but awarded damages against the driver who had previously settled.

One driver was involved in a rear-end collision, which caused injuries to their back, head, and neck. The case resulted in a jury verdict for the plaintiff.

One driver was stopped at an intersection when another driver rear-ended her vehicle, pushing it into a third car. The injured driver sustained neck and back injuries requiring ongoing medical treatment. Her medical bills were over $47,600. She sued her insurance company and the driver who hit her, alleging they failed to control their vehicle, maintain a proper lookout, and brake in time to avoid the collision. The jury awarded over $1.24 million.