Troy, Texas Jury Awards $100,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when the vehicle behind him hit his trailer, pushing his truck into the vehicle in front. The vehicle behind that one then rear-ended the middle vehicle. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries. The case proceeded to trial solely on causation and damages after liability was conceded.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $100,000
- County
- Travis County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $100,000 is above the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On September 3, 2015, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on I-35 in Troy, Texas, involving a commercial truck driven by the plaintiff. While the plaintiff's tanker truck was stopped for traffic, it was rear-ended by another commercial truck, operated by the defendant driver in the course of their employment with the defendant employer. This impact propelled the plaintiff's truck into the vehicle in front of it. The defendant driver's truck was also subsequently rear-ended by a third vehicle. The plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries and filed a lawsuit against the defendant driver and the defendant employer, alleging negligence and vicarious liability. The driver of the third vehicle was later dismissed from the case.
Before trial, several of the plaintiff's initial claims were dismissed on summary judgment, and liability for negligence was conceded by the defense. The case proceeded to trial solely on the issues of causation and damages. The plaintiff presented evidence of neck and back injuries, including disc bulges and herniations that led to cervical fusion surgery, with additional lumbar surgery recommended. The plaintiff claimed these injuries affected daily activities and earning capacity, seeking damages for past and future medical expenses, impairment, and pain and suffering.
The defense challenged causation and the extent of injuries, noting the plaintiff's delay in seeking medical treatment and lack of immediate complaints at the scene or the following day. A defense expert spinal surgeon testified that pain would typically manifest closer to the time of an injury. The defense also highlighted the plaintiff's activities shortly after the crash, including working and playing with a band, and suggested the injuries were related to a prior accident in March 2015 involving similar complaints. Additionally, the defense argued that the plaintiff's medical bills were excessive, stating a specific surgical procedure was significantly overpriced.
After a four-day trial and 3.5 hours of deliberation, the jury returned a unanimous verdict, awarding the plaintiff $100,000 in damages. The award included $40,000 for past medical costs, $40,000 for future medical costs, $10,000 for past pain and suffering, and $10,000 for future pain and suffering. A defense motion for a directed verdict on claims for past and future lost earnings was denied; however, the judge subsequently excluded these claims from the jury's consideration on the verdict sheet.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Travis County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Travis County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.