Texas Jury Concludes Narrative Production Rules
One driver was stopped at a traffic light when another driver rear-ended them. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed multiple injuries, including neck, back, and shoulder issues, as well as headaches. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the necessity of some treatments. The jury found the second driver negligent and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $21,936
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $21,936 is near the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On October 27, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred in Dallas, Texas, when the defendant's vehicle struck another car that was stopped while waiting to make a right turn onto a feeder road of U.S. 75. The impact was described as minor, and no police report was filed. Two plaintiffs, occupants of the struck vehicle, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and failing to brake or turn to prevent the collision.
The plaintiffs claimed various injuries, including cervical, lumbar, and thoracic ligamentous and muscular damage, disc protrusions/herniations, and nerve root irritation. One plaintiff reported hitting her head on the steering wheel during the impact. Both plaintiffs sought chiropractic treatment, and MRIs revealed disc protrusions for one plaintiff and hypolordosis for both. They sought damages for past medical bills, physical pain and suffering, and physical impairment. Their counsel argued that the minor impact did not preclude significant injury and attributed any delay in treatment to their busy schedules.
The defendant acknowledged being in a rush and did not strongly dispute liability for the collision, stating he mistakenly believed the plaintiffs' vehicle had proceeded while he was looking left. However, the defense contested the extent of the plaintiffs' injuries, emphasizing the minor nature of the impact and suggesting that delayed treatment indicated a lack of injury. Both sides presented chiropractic expert testimony regarding the reasonableness and necessity of the medical bills and treatment. A defense chiropractic expert opined that much of the treatment, including MRIs, was not medically necessary, and noted that one plaintiff had a prior back injury from a 2010 motor vehicle accident.
Following the trial, a jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $21,936. This amount included $11,831 for past medical costs and $1,000 for past physical pain and suffering for one plaintiff, and $8,605 for past medical costs and $500 for past physical pain and suffering for the other plaintiff.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.