Texas Jury Awards $7,765,000 in Fatal Commercial Truck Crash
A truck driver was killed when a pickup truck crossed the center line and collided head-on with his tanker truck. The tanker truck then caught fire. The driver of the pickup truck was also killed. The survivors of the truck driver sued the pickup truck driver's employer, alleging negligence in hiring, retaining, training, and supervising the driver. The plaintiffs claimed the employer allowed the driver to operate a company vehicle without a license and failed to address issues of fatigued driving. The defense argued that the driver was not acting within the scope of his employment and that the employer had provided instructions for rest that were disregarded.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $9,605,000
- County
- Angelina County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Burns / Lacerations
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $9,605,000 is below the median of $36,240,000 for burns / lacerations cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $9,605,000 to $41,936,423, based on 5 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On January 29, 2016, a head-on collision occurred on Interstate 69 near Zavalla, resulting in two fatalities. A fully loaded tanker truck, driven by the plaintiff's decedent, a 58-year-old truck driver, was traveling southbound when it was struck by a northbound pickup truck. The pickup, owned by the defendant company and driven by its employee, crossed the center line. Both drivers died, and the tanker truck subsequently caught fire. An autopsy report indicated the truck driver's death was primarily caused by carbon monoxide poisoning and secondarily by severe third-degree burns, with a biomechanical expert testifying the decedent was alive and conscious during the fire.
The decedent's survivors filed a lawsuit against the defendant company, alleging its employee was negligent by driving without a license, while fatigued, and by falling asleep at the wheel, causing him to cross the center line. They further claimed the defendant company was negligent and grossly negligent in its hiring, retention, training, and supervision practices. The plaintiffs presented evidence that the defendant company's driver had worked for over 24 hours prior to the accident, driving from Fort Worth to Beaumont for another shift before heading back to Fort Worth, and alleged the company knew about its employees driving company vehicles without licenses and failed to address fatigued driving risks.
The defendant company largely did not dispute its driver's negligence but challenged claims of its own negligence. The company's owner denied knowledge of any employee driving company vehicles without a license, stating it was against company policy. A supervisor testified that instructions were given for the crew to rest in Beaumont before returning to Fort Worth, suggesting the driver disregarded these orders and was therefore outside the course and scope of employment. A defense economist also contested the plaintiffs' calculation of pecuniary losses.
After an eight-day trial and 3.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found both the defendant company and its driver negligent, determining that their actions proximately caused the accident. The jury also concluded that the defendant company was grossly negligent and that its driver was acting within the course and scope of his employment. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $9,605,000. Following the verdict, punitive damages were capped by statute, reducing the final judgment to $7,765,000. The defense indicated an intent to file a motion for a new trial.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Angelina County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Angelina County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.