Texas Jury Awards $7,000,000 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was slowing for traffic when the other driver, who was in the course and scope of his employment, struck the first driver's vehicle from behind. The first driver sustained serious injuries including a spinal fracture and required emergency surgery. The jury found the defendant driver and his employer negligent. The plaintiff was awarded damages for medical bills, physical impairment, disfigurement, pain, and lost earning capacity.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Spinal Cord Injury Injuries
Spinal cord injuries are among the most catastrophic outcomes of car accidents, potentially resulting in partial or complete paralysis. These injuries require extensive medical care and significantly impact quality of life.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,000,000
- County
- Bexar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $7,000,000 is below the median of $25,955,498 for spinal cord injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,000,000 to $67,470,000, based on 23 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A motor vehicle negligence action was filed following a rear-end collision involving a then-39-year-old plaintiff driver and a pick-up truck operated by a defendant driver in the course of employment for a car dealership. The plaintiff sustained an aortic pseudoaneurysm requiring emergency surgery, an unstable L5 burst fracture, a C7-T1 fracture, bilateral pneumothorax and hemothorax, a flail chest with eight fractured ribs, and a severe hip contusion. The plaintiff required extensive surgeries, including lung expansion and drainage, laminectomies, a two-level lumbar fusion, and plating for the ribs. The plaintiff alleged the defendant driver was negligent and grossly negligent, and the employer negligently entrusted the vehicle.
The plaintiff contended the defendant driver was speeding and weaving before striking the plaintiff's vehicle, which was slowing for traffic. Vehicle sensor data indicated the plaintiff was traveling 4 mph when struck by the defendant's truck traveling 71 mph. Witness testimony supported claims of speeding and weaving. The plaintiff also alleged the defendant driver was watching a music video, a claim supported by the driver's deposition. The plaintiff maintained permanent restrictions, a projected need for future spinal surgery, and a lost earning capacity of approximately $1,000,000 as a floor installer. The defendant conceded the driver's negligence but denied gross negligence and negligent entrustment, arguing a cell phone expert's analysis showed insufficient data for a music video, suggesting the driver was likely only listening to music. The defendant also disputed that the driver's prior speeding violations, committed outside of employment, constituted negligent entrustment.
A jury found the defendant driver 80% negligent and the employer 20% negligent on a theory of negligent entrustment. Two jurors found for the defense on the gross negligence claim, preventing a unanimous finding and thereby precluding punitive damages. The jury awarded the plaintiff $7,000,000. This amount included $119,000 for past medical bills, $518,000 for future medical bills, $1,063,000 for future physical impairment, $2,000,000 for future physical pain, and $1,000,000 for future diminution of earning capacity.
Understanding This Case
- Spinal cord injuries are typically permanent, though some incomplete injuries may see partial recovery. Life expectancy may be reduced, and quality of life is significantly impacted.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Bexar County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2021, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bexar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.