Texas Jury Awards $280,000 in Commercial Vehicle Negligence
One driver filed a lawsuit against another driver and a trucking company after a collision. The lawsuit claimed the defendants were negligent in operating a commercial vehicle, causing the plaintiff significant pain and suffering. The plaintiff sought damages for injuries and medical expenses. The defendants contested liability and argued their conduct was not reckless. A jury found the defendants negligent and awarded the plaintiff $280,000 for pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $280,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2023
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $280,000 is above the median of $14,473 for other cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $4,770 to $42,056, based on 190 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A plaintiff initiated a lawsuit against a commercial vehicle operator and a trucking company following a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants' negligent operation of a commercial vehicle caused a collision, resulting in significant injuries, medical expenses, and ongoing pain and suffering.
The defendants contested liability for the accident, specifically arguing that their conduct did not constitute wanton or reckless behavior. The case proceeded to trial, with both parties presenting evidence concerning the accident's circumstances and the extent of the plaintiff's injuries.
On April 20, 2023, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding the commercial vehicle operator and the trucking company negligent. The jury, however, determined that the defendants' conduct did not rise to the level of wanton or reckless behavior. Based on the finding of negligence, the jury awarded the plaintiff $280,000 in damages for pain and suffering.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2023, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.