Texas Judge Awards $11,416 in Deceptive Trade Practices Case
One driver sued a collision center after their car was towed and repaired. The driver alleged deceptive practices and unconscionable conduct, claiming they were misled about repairs and payment. The collision center counterclaimed for repair and storage costs. The court found in favor of the driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $11,417
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $11,417 is near the median of $14,473 for other cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $4,770 to $42,056, based on 190 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In May 2014, following a motor vehicle accident involving the plaintiff's 2003 BMW, the defendant, Allied Collision Center Inc., towed the vehicle from the scene. The plaintiff alleged the defendant's wrecker driver required her to sign a blank invoice before towing, purportedly stating the car would go to storage only and she could select a body shop later. Days later, the plaintiff requested to move the vehicle elsewhere, but the defendant stated work had already commenced. The defendant maintained the signed form authorized repairs.
The plaintiff sued the defendant under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging unconscionable conduct and false, misleading, and deceptive acts. She also contended the defendant refused to release her vehicle without full payment of the insurance repair estimate, despite having performed minimal work. The defendant counterclaimed for unjust enrichment and quantum meruit for work performed and storage. The plaintiff denied the counterclaim, arguing the work and most storage were unauthorized.
The plaintiff sought the value of her vehicle, estimated at $7,000 including sentimental value, and multiple damages under the DTPA, asserting the defendant's conduct was knowing and intentional. She also sought car rental expenses, attorney fees, and litigation costs. The defendant disputed these claims, citing the car's market value was under $3,000, its pre-existing collision damage, and salvage title. The defendant also argued a lack of documentation for certain expenses and costs.
Following a bench trial, the court found the defendant engaged in unconscionable conduct and false, misleading, and deceptive acts, deeming these actions knowing and intentional. The court awarded the plaintiff $2,634.23 in actual damages, $5,268.46 in multiple damages, $3,913.93 in attorney fees, and $500 in litigation costs, totaling $11,416.62. The defendant announced plans to appeal the judgment and requested the court strike findings on attorney fees and litigation costs.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.