Texas Commercial Vehicle Negligence Settles for $1 Million
One driver fell asleep at the wheel and struck a stopped school bus. The collision resulted in multiple fatalities and one passenger sustained a traumatic brain injury. The case involved claims of negligence against the employer and other entities.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Head/Brain Injury Injuries
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) range from mild concussions to severe brain damage. Car accidents are a leading cause of TBI, with effects ranging from temporary symptoms to permanent cognitive impairment.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $1,000,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This settlement of $1,000,000 is near the median of $4,800,000 for head/brain injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $50,000 to $13,478,106, based on 17 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On January 30, 2014, a van carrying fracking crew members on State Highway 72 in the Eagle Ford Shale collided with a stopped school bus. The van's driver, who was also a crew member, reportedly fell asleep after completing a 24-hour shift. The driver and two other passengers died at the scene. A fourth passenger, a 36-year-old fracking crew member, sustained injuries.
The injured crew member and the estates of the deceased filed a lawsuit alleging negligence and gross negligence against multiple entities, including Compass Well Services LLC, Compass Fracturing Services LLC, and EOG Resources Inc. The plaintiffs contended that EOG Resources Inc. owned the natural gas site where they worked. Prior to trial, claims by the estates of the deceased were resolved, and the case proceeded with only the injured crew member's claims against EOG Resources Inc. The plaintiff claimed traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and pain, asserting an inability to work and seeking substantial damages for medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering. A neurology expert for the plaintiff testified that advanced MRI scans objectively showed a mild traumatic brain injury.
EOG Resources Inc. argued the accident occurred off its premises and that it had no control over how the employer directed its employees' travel. The defense's neurology expert opined that the plaintiff was malingering, citing neuropsychological test results. Defense also presented social media evidence suggesting the plaintiff had started a woodworking business after the accident, which involved complex carpentry, indicating no brain damage.
The jury deliberated for two hours after a five-day trial. They found EOG Resources Inc. 30 percent negligent, along with other defendants, and determined that EOG had actual knowledge of a danger but failed to warn the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $8,715,000. However, moments before the verdict was officially read, the plaintiff and EOG Resources Inc. reached a $1 million settlement agreement, concluding the case against EOG.
Understanding This Case
- Most mild TBIs resolve within weeks to months. Moderate to severe TBI often results in permanent impairment affecting cognition, behavior, and physical function.
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver was slowing down in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another car. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, head, and neck. The other driver's insurance paid some of its policy limit. The injured driver then sued their own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits, claiming their damages exceeded the amount recovered. The defense conceded fault for the accident, and the trial focused on the extent of the injuries.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.