Tarrant County Jury Finds Split Negligence, Awards $6,300 in Bicycle-Vehicle Collision
One person was riding a bicycle on a street and approached an intersection. Another driver was approaching from the left and had a stop sign. The driver hit the cyclist, who claimed multiple injuries. The cyclist sued the driver, alleging negligence. The driver denied negligence and claimed the cyclist was riding against traffic. The cyclist sustained injuries including headaches and disc issues.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,500
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Bicycle
- Case Type
- Back and Neck, Headaches, Bulging Disc
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $10,500 is near the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A bicycle-vehicle collision occurred on September 15, 2014, in Tarrant County, Texas, leading to a negligence lawsuit. The plaintiff, a 67-year-old bicyclist, claimed he was riding on the left side of a two-way street, or on the sidewalk, and was proceeding through an intersection in a crosswalk after he observed the defendant stop at a stop sign. The plaintiff alleged the defendant, who was approaching from his left, negligently ran the stop sign, failed to yield the right of way, and failed to keep a proper lookout, striking him and causing multiple injuries.
The defendant denied negligence, testifying that she stopped and looked both ways before proceeding, moving only a foot before impact. She admitted not seeing the plaintiff before the collision. The defense argued that the plaintiff was riding against traffic in the street, referencing the point of impact documented in the police report. The plaintiff countered that the police report's impact location was where he landed, and that police did not arrive until after his transport, thus not speaking with him. The defense also contended that no crosswalk existed at the intersection, only stop lines for vehicles. Both sides presented prior inconsistent statements from the other party regarding awareness of the approaching vehicle and impact speed.
The plaintiff sustained various injuries, including headaches, multiple cervical and lumbar disc bulges, and radiculitis, and sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain, anguish, and physical impairment. His medical bills totaled over $10,000. After a one-day trial, the jury deliberated for 35 minutes and returned a verdict, finding both parties negligent.
The jury apportioned 60 percent of the fault to the defendant and 40 percent to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $10,500 for past medical costs, past physical impairment, and past and future physical pain and mental anguish. After the reduction for comparative responsibility, the plaintiff's net recovery totaled $6,300.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. The injured driver claimed to have suffered back and neck injuries, and that the accident aggravated pre-existing conditions. The jury found the driver who caused the collision liable and awarded damages, but the plaintiff received nothing due to prior insurance settlements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck. The driver who caused the collision stated her foot slipped off the brake pedal. The jury found that the collision was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.