Tarrant County Jury Awards $6,355 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when another driver rear-ended her vehicle. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, neck, and shoulder, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The other driver claimed her brakes failed. The jury found the other driver liable for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,355
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $6,355 is near the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In August 2014, a vehicle driven by the plaintiff was rear-ended in Tarrant County, Texas, while stopped at a red traffic signal. The trailing vehicle was driven by the defendant driver. The plaintiff sustained injuries to her back, neck, and a shoulder and subsequently filed a lawsuit. The suit initially named both the defendant driver and the vehicle owner, the defendant driver's father, alleging negligence in operation against the driver and negligent entrustment against the owner. The claim against the vehicle owner was later dismissed, and the case proceeded to trial against the defendant driver.
The plaintiff argued the defendant driver was negligent, noting the defendant driver estimated traveling 30 mph at the time of impact. Eyewitnesses testified that the defendant driver's brake lights did not illuminate. The plaintiff contended that even if the brakes failed, the brake lights should have activated. The police report did not mention brake failure but listed failure to control speed as a contributing factor for the defendant driver. The plaintiff sought $2,354.82 for past medical expenses, primarily for chiropractic care and physical therapy, and $10,000 for past and future physical pain and mental anguish, testifying to ongoing discomfort and an inability to run for several months post-accident.
The defendant driver denied negligence, asserting that her brakes had failed. The defense disputed causation for the plaintiff's claimed injuries and highlighted minor inconsistencies in the medical billing and records, suggesting the treatment and complaints were motivated by the lawsuit. After deliberation, the jury found the defendant driver liable for the accident and awarded the plaintiff $6,355 in damages.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. The injured driver claimed to have suffered back and neck injuries, and that the accident aggravated pre-existing conditions. The jury found the driver who caused the collision liable and awarded damages, but the plaintiff received nothing due to prior insurance settlements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck. The driver who caused the collision stated her foot slipped off the brake pedal. The jury found that the collision was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.