Tarrant County Jury Awards $52,680 in Rear-End Crash, No Net Recovery
One driver was stopped in traffic on an interstate highway when another driver rear-ended her vehicle. The impact pushed the stopped vehicle into the one in front of it. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries and sought damages for medical bills, pain, and lost earnings. The defense questioned the severity of the impact and the extent of the injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $52,681
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $52,681 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In 2011, an independent delivery driver, operating a box truck southbound on Interstate 35 West in Tarrant County near North Loop 820, stopped after witnessing an accident ahead. Another vehicle, a pickup truck pulling a trailer, then rear-ended the plaintiff's truck, pushing it into the vehicle in front. The plaintiff claimed neck and back injuries, including sprains, strains, and cervical disc bulges, and was transported to the emergency room before beginning chiropractic treatment three days later.
The plaintiff initially settled with the at-fault driver for the policy limit. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a separate lawsuit against the underinsured motorist carrier for benefits, alleging the at-fault driver negligently failed to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake effectively. The plaintiff testified to being thrown into the steering wheel, bending the dashboard, and suffering persistent pain despite treatment, leading her to sell her business and take a lower-paying job. She sought damages for past medical bills, past and future physical pain, and past and future lost earnings.
The underinsured motorist carrier did not strongly dispute the at-fault driver's negligence but contested the severity of the impact and the plaintiff's injuries. The defense noted that the vehicles' airbags did not deploy and questioned the plaintiff's credibility and memory. They highlighted that the plaintiff was referred to a chiropractor by an attorney, had no treatment for accident-related injuries after 2011, and had provided inconsistent testimony regarding the location of her worst pain, prior neck and back injuries, and the duration of her time off work.
After a 70-minute deliberation, the jury found the at-fault driver negligent and awarded the plaintiff damages totaling $52,680.75 for past medical costs, past lost earnings capability, and past physical pain. However, the plaintiff ultimately took nothing because the defendant was entitled to credits totaling $55,000, which included the initial settlement amount from the at-fault driver's liability policy and payments made under the plaintiff's medical payments coverage.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Tarrant County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. The injured driver claimed to have suffered back and neck injuries, and that the accident aggravated pre-existing conditions. The jury found the driver who caused the collision liable and awarded damages, but the plaintiff received nothing due to prior insurance settlements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck. The driver who caused the collision stated her foot slipped off the brake pedal. The jury found that the collision was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.