Sealy, Texas Jury Awards $1.63M in Railroad Crossing Crash
A train struck a car crossing railroad tracks, resulting in the death of one occupant and severe injuries to another. The plaintiffs alleged the crossing was extra-hazardous due to poor visibility and lack of warning devices. The defendants argued the driver was at fault for running a stop sign and using a cell phone. The jury found both the railway company and the driver 50 percent responsible for the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,260,000
- County
- Brazoria County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Catastrophic Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Death, Fracture, Skull
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $3,260,000 is below the median of $11,275,666 for catastrophic injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $3,260,000 to $15,400,000, based on 11 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On February 3, 2013, a compact car driven by the decedent, with a passenger, then 21, was struck by a BNSF Railway Co. train at a railroad crossing in Sealy, Texas. The collision resulted in the driver's death and severe injuries to the passenger, who sustained multiple skull fractures, a traumatic brain injury, and other significant injuries, requiring prolonged hospitalization and rehabilitation.
The injured passenger, through her mother, along with the decedent's estate and family, filed suit against BNSF and the train operator, alleging negligence and gross negligence. The plaintiffs claimed the crossing was extra-hazardous due to poor visibility, inadequate design, and a lack of active warning devices, despite having a stop sign. They further contended that BNSF failed to properly maintain the crossing and its approaches, and that the train operator did not signal or reduce speed. The defendants denied negligence, asserting the accident was solely the driver's fault. They presented video footage from the train showing the driver ran the stop sign and alleged she was distracted by a cell phone.
After a nine-day trial, the jury determined the crossing was extra-hazardous. The jury found BNSF negligent for failing to install a different warning device, adequately maintain the roadway, or for positioning a ballast pile that obstructed motorists' views. The jury also found the driver negligent for failing to stop at the stop sign or before the tracks. Responsibility for the accident was apportioned 50% to BNSF and 50% to the driver. The jury awarded $3.26 million in damages, covering the passenger's future medical costs and lost earning capacity, and the driver's funeral and burial expenses. No damages were awarded for the passenger's pain and suffering or for the driver's family's wrongful death claims. After the comparative fault reduction, the plaintiffs' total recovery was $1.63 million.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Brazoria County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Brazoria County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.