Ore City Jury Awards $101.3 Million in Rear-End Truck Collision
One driver was operating a pickup truck when it was struck from behind by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. He alleged the tractor-trailer driver was negligent and under the influence of drugs. The defense argued the collision was minor and the injuries claimed were not caused by the accident. The jury found negligence and gross negligence on the part of the defendants.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $101,361,337
- County
- Upshur County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $101,361,337 is above the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In Ore City, Texas, a vehicle collision occurred on September 15, 2013, when a tractor-trailer struck the rear of a pickup truck driven by the plaintiff, a crane operator. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained back and neck injuries from the incident. He subsequently filed a lawsuit against the tractor-trailer's driver and the driver's employer, alleging negligence and gross negligence in the vehicle's operation. The plaintiff further claimed the employer was vicariously liable for the driver's actions and negligent in its hiring and training practices.
The plaintiff asserted the driver was operating under the influence of marijuana and methamphetamine, citing positive drug test results presented as evidence. Evidence also indicated the employer's hiring policies may have been violated due to the driver's prior traffic violations, and the driver acknowledged not completing all required training. Additionally, the driver was on probation with the company due to previous accidents at the time of the collision. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical bills, lost earning capacity, physical pain, mental anguish, physical impairment, and punitive damages, claiming long-term disability following disc replacement surgery and persistent pain.
The defense countered that in-cab video showed no distracted behavior by the driver. The defense disputed that the driver was under the influence of drugs, with the driver testifying to minimal drug use unrelated to work, and noted prior negative drug tests during employment. The defense also argued that the driver received extensive training and that prior traffic violations did not fall within the company's specific 36-month exclusion period for hiring. Furthermore, the defense contended that the collision was minor and could not have caused the claimed injuries, pointing to the plaintiff's statement to police at the scene that he was not hurt.
After hearing the arguments and evidence, a jury found the defendants negligent and grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff a total of $101,361,337.09. This included $26,311,337.09 in actual damages, for which the employer was held entirely liable and the driver was held 30 percent liable. Punitive damages totaled $75,050,000, with $75,000,000 assessed against the employer and $50,000 against the driver.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Upshur County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Upshur County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.