Verdictly
Verdict-Defense
Montgomery County • 2024

Montgomery County Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Car Crash Trial, Awards $3,018

One driver was traveling on a freeway when their vehicle was struck by another vehicle. The driver who was struck filed a lawsuit alleging the other driver operated their vehicle negligently. The defendant denied fault and claimed the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages, as did third parties. The defendant also asserted that the plaintiff's injuries were due to prior medical problems and that the defendant faced an unexpected emergency. The case went to trial, and the jury found in favor of the defendant.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Defense
Amount
$11,110
County
Montgomery County, TX
Resolved
2024

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Accident

Settlement Context

This verdict-defense of $11,110 is above the median of Undisclosed for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-defense. The typical range is Undisclosed to Undisclosed, based on 171 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On July 22, 2016, a vehicle driven by the plaintiff was struck by a vehicle operated by the defendant on 45 North Freeway in Shenandoah, Montgomery County, Texas. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit on July 3, 2017, alleging the defendant's negligent operation of an automobile. Claims included failure to maintain an assured clear distance, excessive speed, and driver inattention. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical expenses, physical pain, lost wages, vehicle repair costs, and other related expenses.

The defendant filed a general denial on August 2, 2017, asserting the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. The defense also claimed the plaintiff's injuries resulted from prior or subsequent medical problems, cited a sudden emergency, and sought reductions for comparative fault.

The case proceeded to trial, concluding with a jury verdict on December 14, 2023, in favor of the defendant. The jury awarded the defendant $6,955.00 in damages against the plaintiff. On January 29, 2024, the court entered a final judgment, awarding the defendant $3,018.85 in general damages. The court also ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant's attorneys' fees and costs totaling $1,136.27. The defendant prevailed in the final judgment.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Montgomery County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2024, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

52
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Montgomery County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.

Dallas County • 2020
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped at a stop sign when her vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her back and neck. The driver who caused the collision stated her foot slipped off the brake pedal. The jury found that the collision was not a proximate cause of the injuries claimed.

Tarrant County • 2019
View full case
$12,637
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.

Dallas County • 2019
View full case
$28,412
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.

Tarrant County • 2021
View full case
$49,271
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.

Hidalgo County • 2019
View full case