Maricopa County Jury Awards $19.25M in Fatal Truck Collision
A driver lost control of his vehicle after a tire separation and collided with the rear of a parked tractor trailer. The driver was killed, and passengers in his vehicle were seriously injured. The passengers and the driver's estate filed suit against the tire manufacturer, tire installer, trucking company, and trailer manufacturer. The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Wrongful Death Injuries
Wrongful death claims arise when a car accident fatality is caused by another party's negligence. These cases compensate surviving family members for their losses and the decedent's pain and suffering.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $19,250,000
- County
- Maricopa County, AZ
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $19,250,000 is above the median of $6,500,000 for wrongful death cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $800,000 to $15,000,000, based on 34 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On July 19, 2011, a driver operating a 2003 Chevrolet Silverado experienced a tread/belt separation on a tire, leading to a loss of vehicle control. The Silverado then collided with the rear of a disabled tractor-trailer that was parked on the side of a roadway in Maricopa County, Arizona, with its hazard lights flashing. The tractor-trailer driver was employed by a Landstar BCO. The collision resulted in the fatality of the Silverado driver and serious injuries to three passengers. A fourth passenger was uninjured.
In July 2013, the deceased driver's family and the injured passengers filed a wrongful death and personal injury lawsuit in Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County. The initial complaint named Michelin North America, Inc., Discount Tire Co., Inc., Landstar System, Inc., and Hyundai Translead, Inc. as defendants. Claims included strict liability, product liability, negligence, and punitive damages.
During pre-trial proceedings, the court granted a joint motion to dismiss the claims against the tire manufacturer and the tire installer. Subsequently, the court also granted the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the claims against the trailer manufacturer. With only the trucking company, Landstar System, Inc., remaining as a defendant, the case proceeded to a jury trial. Landstar had previously tendered a $1,000,000 offer of judgment, which the plaintiffs declined. At trial, disputes included the safety of the trucking company's parking, the design of the trailer, the condition of the tire, and the Silverado driver's potential negligence due to cellphone use. On March 13, 2015, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding a total of $19,250,000 in damages. This included $10,250,000 for wrongful death and $9,000,000 for the personal injuries sustained by the passengers.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Maricopa County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Maricopa County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.