Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2016

Houston Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Dram Shop Collision

One driver was heading north on a freeway when a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction struck them head on. The occupants of the first vehicle sustained multiple injuries. The driver of the second vehicle was allegedly intoxicated and driving the wrong way. The case involved claims against the other driver and a bar for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person. The jury found the bar not negligent but awarded damages against the driver who had previously settled.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Head-on
Fracture

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$1,442,500
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2016

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Head-on
Case Type
Fracture, Shoulder, Hand

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $1,442,500 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In November 2012, a head-on collision occurred on the Gulf Freeway in Houston when a vehicle driving the wrong way struck another car. The occupants of the struck vehicle, a driver and two passengers, sustained multiple injuries, including fractures, internal injuries, a ruptured spleen, and soft tissue damage. The driver, a firefighter, was hospitalized for months and underwent several operations. The passengers also received significant medical treatment.

The injured parties initially sued the wrong-way driver, alleging intoxication and negligence. That driver, who was left in a permanent vegetative state, settled for a confidential amount more than six months before trial. The plaintiffs then added Montrose Business Interests, operating as Bayou City Bar & Grill, to the lawsuit, alleging violations of the Texas Dram Shop Act. They claimed the bar served the wrong-way driver when he was obviously intoxicated, posing a clear danger to himself and others. Plaintiffs' witnesses testified the driver consumed numerous drinks, slurred his speech, fell, fought, and was ejected from the bar shortly before the accident. Toxicology and dram shop experts for the plaintiffs opined the driver's blood alcohol content was high and his intoxication would have been obvious to bartenders.

Montrose Business Interests denied negligence and disputed serving the driver while he was obviously intoxicated. The defendant argued that witnesses did not testify to obvious intoxication at the specific times of service, that the driver was ejected earlier than claimed, and may have consumed alcohol at other nearby establishments. The defense also raised a "safe harbor" provision of the Dram Shop Act, which protects alcohol providers if bartenders attend a training program, though plaintiffs questioned compliance.

Following a two-week trial in Houston, the jury found Montrose Business Interests was not negligent. The jury did find the wrong-way driver negligent and awarded the plaintiffs $1,442,500 in damages for past medical costs, pain, impairment, and mental anguish. However, because the wrong-way driver had settled prior to trial, the plaintiffs collected no additional damages from him based on the verdict, and received no damages from Montrose Business Interests.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

43
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$12,637
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.

Dallas County • 2019
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.

Dallas County • 2020
View full case
$2,650
Settlement
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.

Dallas County • 2017
View full case
$28,412
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.

Tarrant County • 2021
View full case
$49,271
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.

Hidalgo County • 2019
View full case