Houston Judge Awards $13,770 in USPS Driver Negligence
One driver brought a negligence claim against the United States after a collision involving a government driver. The court found the government driver at fault for failing to yield the right of way, which caused some of the claimant's injuries. The court awarded damages for a portion of the claimed medical expenses and lost wages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $13,770
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2025
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $13,770 is near the median of $14,473 for other cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $4,770 to $42,056, based on 190 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A Houston, Texas, resident filed a negligence claim against the United States after an automobile accident involving a United States Postal Service (USPS) driver. The plaintiff alleged the USPS driver failed to yield the right of way, resulting in a collision that caused injuries. The case was brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, naming the United States as the defendant due to the government employee's actions within the scope of employment.
On March 31, 2025, the court ruled that the United States was vicariously liable for the accident, finding the USPS driver's failure to yield constituted a breach of duty that proximately caused some of the plaintiff's damages. The court also determined the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent. However, the court concluded that the minor collision did not cause most of the plaintiff's claimed injuries. Damages were limited to expenses proven to be reasonable, necessary, and directly caused by the incident.
Following the trial, the court awarded the plaintiff $13,770.00. This amount included past medical expenses for diagnostic imaging, past lost wages, and attorneys' fees. The judgment represented a partial victory for the plaintiff, who established government liability but received compensation for only a portion of the alleged injuries and damages.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2025, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.