Gun Barrel City Jury Awards $360,748 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped her car on the road, and the driver behind her hit her. The driver who stopped claimed she hit her head and experienced neck pain, dizziness, headaches, and ringing in her ears. The driver who hit her argued that the stop was too sudden and that the injured driver should have moved to another lane. The injured driver stated there were cars in the other lane. The jury found the driver who hit the other car negligent.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Head/Brain Injury Injuries
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) range from mild concussions to severe brain damage. Car accidents are a leading cause of TBI, with effects ranging from temporary symptoms to permanent cognitive impairment.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $360,748
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $360,748 is near the median of $1,893,000 for head/brain injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $93,169 to $9,140,000, based on 45 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On March 16, 2015, a rear-end collision occurred on Main Street in Gun Barrel City, Texas. The plaintiff, a home health nurse, was driving in the left lane and came to a stop when the defendant's vehicle struck hers from behind. A fire truck with an activated siren was approaching the vehicles at the time of the incident. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a head injury during the impact.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent by failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and brake or turn in time. The plaintiff testified she had been stopped for several seconds before the collision. The defendant countered that the plaintiff stopped too suddenly and should have moved into the right lane to yield to the approaching fire truck. The defense also argued the collision was a minor accident, not negligence, and disputed the severity and causation of the plaintiff's claimed injuries.
Following the accident, the plaintiff reported neck pain, dizziness, headaches, tinnitus, and spots in her eyes, later diagnosed as post-concussive syndrome. She claimed permanent tinnitus and mild hearing loss, requiring hearing aids. The plaintiff's otolaryngologist testified that the head impact likely caused the tinnitus, which was probably permanent. The defense's otolaryngology expert opined that if the crash had caused hearing loss, it would have presented itself within a few days, suggesting the later-diagnosed hearing loss stemmed from another cause. However, on cross-examination, the defense expert acknowledged that tinnitus could be related to the accident and could impair hearing. The defense also noted the absence of a police report, minimal vehicle damage, and the plaintiff's statement at the scene that she was "OK."
After a two-day trial and 2.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $360,748.43, including past and future medical costs, and past and future physical impairment and pain. With prejudgment interest and taxable costs, the final judgment totaled $367,334.85.
Understanding This Case
- Most mild TBIs resolve within weeks to months. Moderate to severe TBI often results in permanent impairment affecting cognition, behavior, and physical function.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was slowing down in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another car. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, head, and neck. The other driver's insurance paid some of its policy limit. The injured driver then sued their own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits, claiming their damages exceeded the amount recovered. The defense conceded fault for the accident, and the trial focused on the extent of the injuries.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.