Grand Prairie Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $26,500 in Motorcycle Crash
One driver was motorcycling east when another driver attempted a left turn into an apartment complex. The motorcyclist struck the car and was thrown onto the pavement. The driver who turned was cited for failure to yield the right of way. The motorcyclist claimed multiple injuries, including knee contusions, ankle sprain, hand abrasions, lumbar disc bulge, hip pain, neck pain, shoulder pain, and anxiety.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $26,500
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Hip Injury
- Accident Type
- Motorcycle
- Case Type
- Hip, Anxiety, Chiropractic
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $26,500 is below the median of $474,298 for hip injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $88,000 to $3,098,197, based on 14 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On September 3, 2015, a collision occurred on West Tarrant Road in Grand Prairie, Texas. A deliveryman, operating a motorcycle, was traveling east in the left lane when a driver, heading west, attempted a left turn into an apartment complex. The motorcyclist struck the car's right rear quarter panel and was thrown onto the pavement. The driver received a ticket for failure to yield the right of way.
The motorcyclist subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver, alleging negligence for making an unsafe left turn, failing to yield the right of way, and failing to maintain a proper lookout. The plaintiff claimed multiple injuries, including knee contusions, an ankle sprain, hand abrasions, a lumbar disc bulge, and ongoing pain in the hip, neck, and shoulder, along with anxiety. The plaintiff underwent various treatments, including emergency room visits, chiropractic care, physical therapy, and steroid injections, and claimed lost work time and persistent pain. The investigating officer testified that the defendant failed to yield.
The defendant testified that she stopped and looked for oncoming traffic before initiating her turn and denied negligence, asserting she acted as a reasonably prudent driver. While the defense did not dispute the reasonableness of the plaintiff's medical bills, it contested the amount sought for non-economic damages. The defense highlighted that the plaintiff ceased treatment seven weeks post-accident and that chiropractic records indicated decreasing pain and full range of motion at the last evaluation.
After a one-day trial, the jury found the defendant negligent. The jury, in a 10-2 verdict, awarded the plaintiff $26,500 in damages. The two dissenting jurors had voted against finding liability.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.