Georgia Judge Awards $6,709.97 for Car Crash Property Damage
One driver filed a lawsuit against another driver and a trucking company after a car crash. The lawsuit claimed the driver negligently operated a vehicle, causing property damage. The trucking company argued it had ceased operations. After a trial, the court found the plaintiff was entitled to damages and attorney's fees.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,709
- County
- Gwinnett County, GA
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $6,709 is below the median of $21,682 for other cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $6,775 to $100,000, based on 309 cases in our database.
Case Overview
An insurer, acting as subrogee of an insured, initiated a lawsuit against an individual driver and a trucking company following an automobile collision that occurred on October 9, 2019. The plaintiff alleged the individual defendant negligently operated a motor vehicle owned by the co-defendant trucking company, causing property damage to the insured's vehicle. The plaintiff sought to recover $5,809.97 paid for property damage, claiming the individual defendant was an employee or agent of the trucking company, making the company liable under the doctrine of *Respondeat Superior*.
The trucking company asserted it had ceased operations and subsequently bankrupted in October 2019, arguing it had no assets or income and was only liable for its own debts. Despite this defense, the case proceeded against both defendants. The plaintiff also sought attorney's fees, alleging the defendants had been stubbornly litigious under Georgia law. Following a bench trial on May 4, 2022, the court found by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff was entitled to damages and attorney's fees. The court awarded $5,809.97 in damages and $900.00 in attorney's fees, for a total judgment of $6,709.97 plus court costs. The judgment was specifically entered against the individual defendant.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Gwinnett County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2022, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Gwinnett County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On August 1, 2013, a pedestrian was injured in a hit-and-run accident at the intersection of Eighth Avenue and 40th Street in New York City. The pedestrian was in a crosswalk when an unknown vehicle struck her, causing severe personal injuries. The driver fled the scene without identifying themselves. On July 15, 2016, the injured party filed a claim against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MUAIC), asserting compliance with applicable state insurance law and claiming to be a covered person who had sustained a serious injury. The plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries, alleging the accident was caused solely by the negligence of the unknown driver and that all other available remedies had been exhausted. MUAIC responded with several defenses, arguing that the plaintiff's injuries were caused, in whole or in part, by her own conduct, or that she had not sustained a "serious injury" as defined under the state's insurance law. MUAIC also contended that the plaintiff might receive reimbursement from collateral sources, which would entitle the corporation to offset costs. The case proceeded to trial, and on November 18, 2019, a jury returned a verdict in favor of MUAIC, awarding no damages to the plaintiff.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.