Galveston Jury Finds Split Liability in Auto Collision
One driver was traveling west and entered an intersection. Another driver, attempting to make a right turn on red, impacted the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed neck and back injuries. The defense argued that the injured driver made an unsafe lane change and that both drivers were equally responsible for the accident. The jury awarded $1 for past medical expenses, reduced by comparative negligence.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1
- County
- Galveston County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $1 is below the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In December 2015, a collision occurred at the intersection of Stewart Road and 61st Street in Galveston, Texas. The plaintiff, a private investigator driving west on Stewart Road, alleged the defendant, who was traveling south on 61st Street, impacted the right rear of the plaintiff's SUV while attempting a right turn on red. Police issued the defendant a warning for failure to yield the right-of-way. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, claiming negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle and seeking damages for alleged neck and back injuries, including cervical and lumbar sprains, strains, herniations, and stenosis.
The plaintiff testified that the defendant "T-boned" his SUV while he was in the left lane, arguing the defendant failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right-of-way, and made an unsafe right turn on red. The plaintiff sought $12,750 for past medical expenses, in addition to damages for past physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. Records showed the plaintiff received chiropractic treatment for several months, with an MRI revealing disc herniations.
The defendant testified she stopped at the intersection, looked for traffic, and initiated her turn after another vehicle cleared the right lane. She claimed the plaintiff's vehicle was initially in the left lane but then moved into the right lane, resulting in a glancing impact rather than a "T-bone." The defense argued that the plaintiff made an unsafe lane change and that both drivers were 50 percent responsible for the accident. The defense also disputed the extent and causation of the plaintiff's injuries, citing an 18-day delay in seeking treatment, prior back injuries, minimal vehicle damage, and the plaintiff's activities shown in post-accident social media photos. The defense further noted that records from some medical providers listed the plaintiff's law firm as a guarantor, questioning the medical necessity of certain treatments.
After deliberations, the jury found both the plaintiff and the defendant 50 percent negligent for the collision. The jury awarded the plaintiff $1 for past medical expenses, which was reduced to 50 cents to reflect the comparative negligence finding.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Galveston County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Galveston County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.