Dallas Jury Finds Split Liability in Collision, Awards $6,477
One driver was entering a highway ramp when they collided with another vehicle. The first driver claimed a knee injury. The second driver denied fault, stating the first driver entered their lane. The jury found both drivers partially at fault.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,500
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Knee Injury
- Accident Type
- Sideswipe
- Case Type
- Medial Meniscus, Tear
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $7,500 is below the median of $37,329 for knee injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,500 to $82,795, based on 16 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In April 2013, a collision occurred on an entrance ramp from Interstate 67 to westbound Interstate 20 in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff, a 59-year-old aerospace engineer, was driving a 2012 Volkswagen Jetta when it collided with a pickup truck driven by the defendant. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant negligently attempted to enter his lane from the left without maintaining a proper lookout. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a medial meniscus tear in his right knee, underwent physical therapy, and sought over $10,000 in medical expenses, along with damages for pain, suffering, and physical impairment.
The defendant denied negligence, contending that the plaintiff had entered the defendant's lane, sideswiping his vehicle. Defense counsel argued that the damage location on both vehicles supported this version of events, further asserting that the defendant's travel destination provided no reason to enter the plaintiff's lane. Regarding damages, the defense disputed the nature of the plaintiff's knee injury, arguing it was pre-existing. A defense orthopedics expert testified that the injury was a radial tear, more commonly associated with repetitive stress than a traumatic incident.
Following a one-day trial and three hours of jury deliberation, the jury found both parties liable for the collision. The defendant was determined to be 70 percent at fault, and the plaintiff 30 percent at fault. The jury awarded the plaintiff $7,500. After adjusting for comparative liability, along with court costs and prejudgment interest, the final award totaled $6,477.24.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.