Dallas Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $5,675
One driver claimed an unidentified driver cut him off, causing him to rear-end that vehicle. The unidentified driver then fled the scene. The injured driver sought uninsured motorist benefits from his insurer. The defense questioned the injured driver's credibility and argued he failed to prove the other driver's negligence. The defense also suggested the damage to the injured driver's vehicle was inconsistent with hitting another car.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,102
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $7,102 is near the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In July 2014, a plaintiff reported that an unidentified driver cut off his loaner sport utility vehicle on U.S. 175 in Dallas, causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff claimed the other driver fled the scene. He sustained neck and back injuries, and his vehicle's airbags deployed. Three days after the incident, the plaintiff filed a walk-in police report. When his uninsured motorist claim with Geico Choice Insurance Co. was not resolved, the plaintiff sued the insurer, alleging the unidentified driver's negligence.
The plaintiff sought compensation totaling over $70,000 for past medical bills, past lost earning capacity, and past and future physical pain and impairment. He testified about receiving treatment at an emergency room and from a chiropractor, asserting that his pain continued through the time of trial. The plaintiff sought to distinguish these injuries from those sustained in prior and subsequent accidents, stating that earlier neck and back issues had resolved and other injuries were primarily rotator cuff tears.
The defense challenged the plaintiff's credibility, arguing that he failed to prove the unidentified driver's negligence by a preponderance of the evidence. Defense attorneys highlighted inconsistencies in the plaintiff's testimony regarding the incident's details and suggested that photos of vehicle damage were more consistent with an impact against a vertical pole than another vehicle's bumper. The defense also presented evidence of the plaintiff's prior felony and misdemeanor convictions, and contended that his neck and back injuries were pre-existing, citing medical records from before and after the incident.
After a two-day trial, a jury found the unidentified driver negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $7,101.50 solely for past medical bills. Following adjustments for previously paid personal injury protection benefits, prejudgment interest, and taxable costs, the final judgment totaled $5,675.27.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.