Dallas Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $12,100
One driver was stopped or stopping at a red light when the other driver rear-ended her. The impact pushed the first driver's vehicle into the vehicle in front of it. The first driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries and sought damages for medical bills, lost earning capacity, pain, and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $13,200
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $13,200 is near the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On May 16, 2015, a delivery driver, the plaintiff, was operating a Cadillac SRX SUV east on Lovers Lane in Dallas, Texas, when her vehicle was rear-ended. The collision occurred as the plaintiff was stopped or slowing for a red light at Devonshire Drive. The defendant, driving a Lexus RX 350 SUV, struck the plaintiff's vehicle, pushing it into the car ahead. The plaintiff claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent by failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, or brake effectively. The plaintiff asserted her vehicle was stationary when the impact occurred. The defendant denied negligence, testifying that the plaintiff's vehicle slowed suddenly, and her brakes failed. The defendant had also reported brake failure to police at the scene. However, inconsistencies emerged between the defendant's trial testimony and her prior deposition regarding the plaintiff's vehicle being stationary.
The plaintiff sought approximately $6,087 for past medical bills, along with damages for lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, and physical impairment. The presiding judge ruled that the defense could not challenge the reasonableness or necessity of the plaintiff's medical bills during trial, limiting the defense to stating the jury could award a different amount if they found bills excessive.
After a one-day trial and 1.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $13,200. This award included $6,100 for past medical costs, $2,100 for past lost earning capacity, and $5,000 for past physical pain and suffering. Post-trial, the parties stipulated to reduce the lost earning capacity award from $2,100 to $1,000, resulting in a final judgment of $12,100.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.