Dallas Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $78,655 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was traveling north when another driver abruptly shifted into his lane, causing a rear-end collision. The injured driver claimed injuries to his head, neck, back, and right knee. The other driver and their employer denied liability, alleging the injured driver was speeding and intoxicated. The injured driver stated he had stopped drinking hours before the crash and was only slightly exceeding the speed limit. He was diagnosed with a partial tear of his right anterior cruciate ligament.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $82,795
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Knee Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $82,795 is above the median of $37,329 for knee injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,500 to $82,795, based on 16 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On February 16, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred on the Dallas North Tollway in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff, an employee, was traveling northbound when a taxi, operated by an Eagle Cab employee and owned by Irving Holdings Inc., abruptly shifted into the plaintiff's lane. The plaintiff sustained injuries to his head, neck, back, and right knee, later diagnosed with a partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the taxi driver and Irving Holdings Inc., alleging negligence due to an unsafe lane change. Dallas Car Leasing, the lessor of the taxi, intervened in the suit to claim damages to the vehicle. The defendants denied liability, arguing the plaintiff was responsible for the collision. They alleged the plaintiff was intoxicated and speeding above the posted 65 mph limit. The defendants also issued a counterclaim for negligence against the plaintiff and named three bars the plaintiff visited prior to the incident as responsible third parties. The plaintiff testified that he had stopped drinking hours before the crash, passed field sobriety tests, and was only traveling 5 mph over the speed limit. Defense counsel also disputed the severity of the plaintiff's injuries and noted gaps in his medical treatment.
After a one-day trial, the jury deliberated for 90 minutes. The jury found the taxi driver 95 percent liable and the plaintiff 5 percent liable. The plaintiff was awarded $82,795 for past medical costs, future physical impairment, and future pain and suffering. This amount was reduced to $78,655 based on comparative liability. Dallas Car Leasing, as the intervenor, was awarded $8,950 for property damage, which was reduced to $447.50.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.