Dallas Jury Awards $49,075 in Motor Vehicle Negligence
One driver attempted an illegal U-turn and struck another vehicle from the side. The occupants of the struck vehicle were transported to the hospital with injuries. One driver reported neck and lower back pain, while the other sustained injuries to their right leg and shoulder. Medical treatment included physical therapy and injections. The jury found the defendant's actions caused the plaintiffs' damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $49,075
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, U-Turn Collision
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $49,075 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In a motor vehicle negligence case heard in Dallas, Texas, a plaintiff driver and a plaintiff passenger sought damages after their vehicle was struck by a defendant driver on February 26, 2016. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendant driver attempted an illegal U-turn on Valleyview Lane and failed to yield, colliding with the right rear side of their westbound vehicle. Both plaintiffs were transported to a hospital with immediate bodily injuries. The plaintiff driver reported neck and lower back injuries, leading to diagnoses including radiculopathy and sprains, and claimed six months of lost wages. The plaintiff passenger sustained injuries to a leg and shoulder.
The plaintiffs filed suit, alleging the defendant's negligence caused their permanent injuries, lost wages, and property damage. While the defendant stipulated liability for the collision itself, the defendant contested the nature, causation, and extent of the claimed damages. The defense argued that the plaintiffs' injuries were not substantial, treatment was excessive, and the plaintiff driver's medical expenses and lost wages were attributable to pre-existing conditions unrelated to the accident.
After mediation failed, the case proceeded to trial. On March 25, 2019, the jury found that the defendant's actions caused the plaintiffs' damages. The jury awarded the plaintiff driver $32,191 for past medical expenses and the plaintiff passenger $9,315 for past medical expenses. However, the jury did not award either plaintiff damages for future medical expenses, past or future physical impairment, or past or future physical pain and mental anguish. The total award to the plaintiffs, including pre-judgment interest and court costs, was $49,075.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.